Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvote or not to jvote]

[Morgan Delagrange]

So, what was the answer to the question below?  If we really do need two +1s
for a nomination, then I have some campaigning to do!  (Unless someone else
wants to go ahead and +1 me, if only to shut me up.  ;)

- Original Message -
From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote


> ARE two +1 votes necessary?  That was not mentioned in the original email
> "Announcement: JakartaPMC elections for 2002".  (Just to stave off any
> potential debate here, the ASF-appointed administrator gets to decide how
> elections are run.  It's not our call.)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PM
> Subject: RE: To jvote or not to jvote
>
>
> > Thanks Dirk.
> >
> >
> > But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only
> > Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
> > +1s all sent to "jvote".
> >
> > How should this be fixed?
> >
> >
> > This is what I see in "general":
> > (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)
> >
> >  - Ted Husted
> >  The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Stefan Bodewig
> >  - Conor MacNeill
> >  Nothing went to "jvote".
> >  (I think that both are still missing votes.)
> >
> >  - Scott Sanders
> >  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Sam Ruby
> >  Nothing went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Peter Donald
> >  Nothing went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Paulo Gaspar
> >  Nothing went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Morgan Delagranje
> >  Only his acceptance went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Geir Magnusson
> >  Enough votes went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Diane Holt
> >  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Craig McClanahan
> >  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
> >
> >  - Costin Manolache
> >  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Paulo Gaspar
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> > > To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> > >
> > > > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> > >
> > > > Why? What are the rules?
> > >
> > > See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure
it
> > > is clearer.
> > >
> > > What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> > > from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> > > be run in the election.
> > >
> > > Dw.
> > >
> > >
> > > T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> > > February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> > > nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> > > from the nominee being received.
> > >
> > > ->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> > > description about who you are, what you want to
> > > accomplish.
> > >
> > > ->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> > > message confirming that you are accepting the
> > > nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> > >
> > > ->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> > > wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> > > you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> > > he or she would consent of course.)
> > >
> > > ->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> > > be nominated.
> > >
> > > ->  The nomination must include the email address of
> > > the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: To jvote or not to jvote

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:

> But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only
> Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
> +1s all sent to "jvote".
>
> How should this be fixed?

I fear by having to be manually be going through the archives careully.

Thanks for compiling the checklist below !

As an extra safeguard - the 3 volunteers will send out a message to
general@ with what they think is the proper list on the 7th. With a 48
hours to correct exactly this sort of thing.

Dw

> This is what I see in "general":
> (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)
>
>  - Ted Husted
>  The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".
>
>  - Stefan Bodewig
>  - Conor MacNeill
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>  (I think that both are still missing votes.)
>
>  - Scott Sanders
>  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Sam Ruby
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Peter Donald
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Paulo Gaspar
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Morgan Delagranje
>  Only his acceptance went to "jvote".
>
>  - Geir Magnusson
>  Enough votes went to "jvote".
>
>  - Diane Holt
>  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Craig McClanahan
>  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
>  - Costin Manolache
>  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo Gaspar
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> > To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> >
> > > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> >
> > > Why? What are the rules?
> >
> > See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
> > is clearer.
> >
> > What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> > from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> > be run in the election.
> >
> > Dw.
> >
> >
> > T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> > February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> > nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> > from the nominee being received.
> >
> > ->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> > description about who you are, what you want to
> > accomplish.
> >
> > ->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> > message confirming that you are accepting the
> > nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> >
> > ->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> > wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> > you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> > he or she would consent of course.)
> >
> > ->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> > be nominated.
> >
> > ->  The nomination must include the email address of
> > the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: To jvote or not to jvote

[Morgan Delagrange]

ARE two +1 votes necessary?  That was not mentioned in the original email
"Announcement: JakartaPMC elections for 2002".  (Just to stave off any
potential debate here, the ASF-appointed administrator gets to decide how
elections are run.  It's not our call.)

- Original Message -
From: "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:52 PM
Subject: RE: To jvote or not to jvote


> Thanks Dirk.
>
>
> But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only
> Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
> +1s all sent to "jvote".
>
> How should this be fixed?
>
>
> This is what I see in "general":
> (I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)
>
>  - Ted Husted
>  The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".
>
>  - Stefan Bodewig
>  - Conor MacNeill
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>  (I think that both are still missing votes.)
>
>  - Scott Sanders
>  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Sam Ruby
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Peter Donald
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Paulo Gaspar
>  Nothing went to "jvote".
>
>  - Morgan Delagranje
>  Only his acceptance went to "jvote".
>
>  - Geir Magnusson
>  Enough votes went to "jvote".
>
>  - Diane Holt
>  Only the nomination went to "jvote".
>
>  - Craig McClanahan
>  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
>  - Costin Manolache
>  Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".
>
> Have fun,
> Paulo Gaspar
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> > To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> >
> > > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> >
> > > Why? What are the rules?
> >
> > See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
> > is clearer.
> >
> > What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> > from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> > be run in the election.
> >
> > Dw.
> >
> >
> > T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> > February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> > nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> > from the nominee being received.
> >
> > ->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> > description about who you are, what you want to
> > accomplish.
> >
> > ->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> > message confirming that you are accepting the
> > nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> >
> > ->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> > wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> > you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> > he or she would consent of course.)
> >
> > ->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> > be nominated.
> >
> > ->  The nomination must include the email address of
> > the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: To jvote or not to jvote

[Paulo Gaspar]

Thanks Dirk.


But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only 
Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
+1s all sent to "jvote".

How should this be fixed?


This is what I see in "general":
(I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)

 - Ted Husted
 The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".

 - Stefan Bodewig
 - Conor MacNeill
 Nothing went to "jvote".
 (I think that both are still missing votes.)

 - Scott Sanders
 Only the nomination went to "jvote".

 - Sam Ruby
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Peter Donald
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Paulo Gaspar
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Morgan Delagranje
 Only his acceptance went to "jvote".

 - Geir Magnusson
 Enough votes went to "jvote".

 - Diane Holt
 Only the nomination went to "jvote".

 - Craig McClanahan
 Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".

 - Costin Manolache
 Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".

Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar


> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> 
> > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> 
> > Why? What are the rules?
> 
> See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
> is clearer.
> 
> What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> be run in the election.
> 
> Dw.
> 
> 
> T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> from the nominee being received.
> 
> ->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> description about who you are, what you want to
> accomplish.
> 
> ->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> message confirming that you are accepting the
> nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> 
> ->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> he or she would consent of course.)
> 
> ->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> be nominated.
> 
> ->  The nomination must include the email address of
> the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: To jvote or not to jvote

[Paulo Gaspar]

Thanks Dirk.


But then, from what I can see in the "general" list, only 
Geir has both the nomination and the 2 necessary additional
+1s all sent to "jvote".

How should this be fixed?


This is what I see in "general":
(I am skipping those that refused the nomination.)

 - Ted Husted
 The 3rd +1 did not get to "jvote".

 - Stefan Bodewig
 - Conor MacNeill
 Nothing went to "jvote".
 (I think that both are still missing votes.)

 - Scott Sanders
 Only the nomination went to "jvote".

 - Sam Ruby
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Peter Donald
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Paulo Gaspar
 Nothing went to "jvote".

 - Morgan Delagranje
 Only his acceptance went to "jvote".

 - Geir Magnusson
 Enough votes went to "jvote".

 - Diane Holt
 Only the nomination went to "jvote".

 - Craig McClanahan
 Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".

 - Costin Manolache
 Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote".

Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar


> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:36 PM
> To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
> 
> > >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
> 
> > Why? What are the rules?
> 
> See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
> is clearer.
> 
> What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
> from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
> be run in the election.
> 
> Dw.
> 
> 
> T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
> February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
> nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
> from the nominee being received.
> 
> ->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
> description about who you are, what you want to
> accomplish.
> 
> ->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
> message confirming that you are accepting the
> nomination - with again - some details about yourself.
> 
> ->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
> wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
> you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
> he or she would consent of course.)
> 
> ->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
> be nominated.
> 
> ->  The nomination must include the email address of
> the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: To jvote or not to jvote

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:

> >From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.

> Why? What are the rules?

See below. We'll debug the message for the next election to make sure it
is clearer.

What we will be checking on the 7th is what we have received on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -> and in particular those messages
from the nominee himself or herself that he or she is willing to
be run in the election.

Dw.


T+7 Nominations for PMC needs to be in by 0:00 GMT 7th of
February 2001. You can either nominate yourself - or
nominate someone else. What counts is the confirmation
from the nominee being received.

->  Posting a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with your candidature, a short
description about who you are, what you want to
accomplish.

->  Or if you are volunteered by someone else - a similar
message confirming that you are accepting the
nomination - with again - some details about yourself.

->  PMC seats are open to anyone. Regardless as to
wether you are a committer, lurker or coder. And
you can even nominate a complete outsider (assuming
he or she would consent of course.)

->  The board volunteers handling the vote cannot
be nominated.

->  The nomination must include the email address of
the nominee. And it really should be a valid one :-)



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: 

To jvote or not to jvote

[Paulo Gaspar]

>From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.

Why?
What are the rules?

If they all should, then a lot are missing!


Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
For additional commands, e-mail: