On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 12:27 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my
robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip/
Agreed. After a little more discussion, we should rewrite this.
+1
anyone feel like jumping volunteering to come up with a draft?
Working on this now...
Phil
-
To unsubscribe,
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than in the incubator). I would
recommend that new packages
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 6/23/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than in the incubator). I would
recommend that
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
snip
Interpreted literally, 17 goes against standard practice in jakarta (or
apache, to my knowledge, other than in the incubator). I would
recommend that new packages require existing committers to support them.
I would at least
