Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread David Leangen
On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 05:43 +0200, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I would recommand using the slf4j api which is one of the best i've seen so > far. > PaxLogging implements it, so you can run your code in OSGi or non OSGi > environment, Ok, thank you, Guillaume ! ___

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread David Leangen
> > But I thought you said just a short while ago (can't find quote, or > > maybe it was just hearsay) that Log4j sucks and that you want to > > implement your own logger in Qi4j? > > Uh, what does this got to do with Qi4j?? Nothing, sorry I confused you so easily by mentioned this word. The que

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I thought you said just a short while ago (can't find quote, or > maybe it was just hearsay) that Log4j sucks and that you want to > implement your own logger in Qi4j? Uh, what does this got to do with Qi4j?? Qi4j is

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I would recommand using the slf4j api which is one of the best i've seen so far. PaxLogging implements it, so you can run your code in OSGi or non OSGi environment, On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:32 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > First, why was log4j chosen as the backend? >> >> Be

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread David Leangen
> > First, why was log4j chosen as the backend? > > Because it is/was the most accepted logging framework on the market, > with a large array of Appenders. But I thought you said just a short while ago (can't find quote, or maybe it was just hearsay) that Log4j sucks and that you want to impleme

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread David Leangen
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 20:06 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:39 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fourth, what is the meaning of life? > > I have just arrived and is heavily jet lagged, on top of German Flu, > so I leave the harder questions for later. T

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:39 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, why was log4j chosen as the backend? Because it is/was the most accepted logging framework on the market, with a large array of Appenders. > Second, why does PaxLoggingService have a direct dependency on the KF >

Re: Questions about Pax Logging

2008-10-20 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:39 AM, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fourth, what is the meaning of life? I have just arrived and is heavily jet lagged, on top of German Flu, so I leave the harder questions for later. Many people knows that "42" is the meaning of life, but that is pure f