Re: PMC Additions

2010-11-28 Thread Michael McCandless
Welcome Simon and Koji! Mike On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: I'm pleased to announce the addition of Simon Willnauer and Koji Sekiguchi to the Lucene PMC.  Both Simon and Koji have been long time contributors/committers to both Lucene and Solr.

RE: PMC Additions

2010-11-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
Congrats! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 1:30 PM To: d...@lucene.apache.org; Lucene mailing list Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1)

2010-11-28 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Maybe we can provide this patch-solr.xml file together with the artifacts or announce it in the release information, so everybody can use it to patch his Solr distribution? Sorry to reply on the vote thread (we can make

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1)

2010-11-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Maybe we can provide this patch-solr.xml file together with the artifacts or announce it in the release information, so everybody can use it to patch his Solr distribution? Sorry to reply on the vote thread (we can

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1)

2010-11-28 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Indeed? I have never seen a commit message on Solr 1.4 branch. Or does those mails don't go to the current commit list? It seems these commits still go to solr-comm...@lucene.apache.org, since the branch is still in the

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1)

2010-11-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
Additionally i got a compiler warning when compiling benchmark: [javac] C:\Users\rmuir\workspace\2.9.4\lucene- 2.9.4\contrib\benchmark\src\java\org\apache\lucene\benchmark\bytask\utils\ Algorithm.java:69: warning: non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for last

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 1)

2010-11-28 Thread Robert Muir
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: I downloaded the source zip files for 2.9.4 and 3.0.3, and the tests failed for me. This is because of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756 (also another similar test fixed in

[VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi all Lucene Java committers and PMC, As Robert found some test problems in the last release artifacts, I have posted a release candidate for both Apache Lucene Java 2.9.4 and 3.0.3 (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release announcement), built from revision 1039909 of

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, +1 for release the artifacts of take #2! I tested the following: - PANGAEA works with 3.0.3 in production: Indexing and searching works, NRQ and our custom query parser. I also optimized a 10 GB index with CFS enabled and it correctly created no CFS anymore (after Mikes patch) - I patched

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Robert Muir
+1. No test problems, no compile warnings, no javadocs warnings, changes.txt looks good on both candidates. On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi all Lucene Java committers and PMC, As Robert found some test problems in the last release artifacts, I have

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Uwe Schindler wrote: The problem you mentioned is there since ages? I don't really understand the implication for the artifacts to vote on? Well, it's the first time I noticed and it makes building on Windows/Cygwin broken as the MANIFEST.MF file is invalid and the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Andi Vajda
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Uwe Schindler wrote: When I call ant in cygwin everything works fine. Is your svn part of cygwin? If yes, that's the problem. Depending on config, pure cygwin pros don't like it to be called by pure win32 apps like java. If you use native win32 svn it works. Indeed,

Re: PMC Additions

2010-11-28 Thread Koji Sekiguchi
(10/11/28 21:30), Grant Ingersoll wrote: I'm pleased to announce the addition of Simon Willnauer and Koji Sekiguchi to the Lucene PMC. Both Simon and Koji have been long time contributors/committers to both Lucene and Solr. Congrats! -Grant Thank you very much! Koji --

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Andi Vajda
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Andi Vajda wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Uwe Schindler wrote: When I call ant in cygwin everything works fine. Is your svn part of cygwin? If yes, that's the problem. Depending on config, pure cygwin pros don't like it to be called by pure win32 apps like java. If

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Lucene 3.0.3 and 2.9.4 artifacts (take 2)

2010-11-28 Thread Andi Vajda
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010, Steven A Rowe wrote: On 11/28/2010 at 7:42 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: Installing SlikSvn 1.6.13 worked around the problem as well. Note that svn commit then no longer works from the cygwin shell, a proper DOS shell is required. I regularly install SlikSvn on Cygwin/Windows,