On 2013-08-20, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> personally i never download snapshots as snapshots reflect the collection
>> of files at a particular date/time
> Well, but that's the whole purpose of Gump.
Right.
As Luis told me off-list, FOP's case is a bit different as FOP uses a
patched version of fo
Hi Martin,
Martin Gainty wrote:
> Luis
>
>
>
> personally i never download snapshots as snapshots reflect the collection
> of files at a particular date/time
Well, but that's the whole purpose of Gump. Even more, Gump will take a
SNAPSHOT anyway - unless you overwrite this in the Gump descr
Luis
personally i never download snapshots as snapshots reflect the collection of
files at a particular date/time
so for example if you would be willing to take 1.8.0 version (no datetime
snapshot)
in maven configuration file which is named -settings.xml or
-settings.xml
locate the conf
Hi Luis,
great that you are looking into the FOP build failure.
On 2013-08-20, Luis Bernardo wrote:
> "The most common occurrence of problems here is introducing a new
> dependency without the Gump project definition being updated. A note
> to general@gump.apache.org letting us know what is goin
On 2009-04-09, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> I notice the XOM gump build failed last night, apparently because I
> added a dependence on JARJAR:
> http://code.google.com/p/jarjar/
> I'm not sure if there's anything I can do to fix this or if you need
> to fix it on your end.
we needed to upd
