Maarten Coene wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 questions regarding dom4j.
1. the project is failing because of this error:
BUILD FAILED
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xml/sax/ext/Attributes2
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.init(Unknown Source
Hi,
I have 3 questions regarding dom4j.
1. the project is failing because of this error:
BUILD FAILED
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xml/sax/ext/Attributes2
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.AbstractSAXParser.init(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser.init(Unknown
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. the project is failing because of this error:
Xerces has switched to the newer SAX version of JAXP 1.3. It probably
works once Gump starts to build again since I added JAXP 1.3's sax.jar
as a dependency to the dom4j build.
2. I
to the dom4j build.
ok thanks!
2. I will start working on a new major version of dom4j, this will
probably cause a lot of build failures... I have created a branch in
CVS for maintaining the current dom4j 1.x releases. I think it would
be good if gump is using this branch (DOM4J_1_X_BRANCH
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Sure. We could keep building HEAD in addition (but make all
dependent projects use the stable branch), if you want to.
that sounds like a good idea.
Done.
Stefan
did,
Jaxen, which requires XOM, doesn't build using JDK 1.5 because of
variables called enum. And through this chain we won't see any
attempts to build dom4j anytime soon, sorry.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dom4j now needs the xpp3 parser...
Instead of xpp2, I'll assume.
Will take care of it.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
No, both xpp2 and xpp3 are required.
thanks,
Maarten
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dom4j now needs the xpp3 parser...
Instead of xpp2, I'll assume.
Will take care of it.
Stefan
Hi,
dom4j now needs the xpp3 parser... could someone please modify the
project descriptor?
thanks,
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 02 Aug 2004, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need the jaxme api to be added to the dom4j project
descriptor.
Done
Stefan
--
http://stefanbodewig.blogger.de/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hi,
dom4j no longer depends on jtidy to run its junit tests. Could someone
please remove that dependency from the project descriptor?
thanks,
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Maarten Coene wrote:
dom4j no longer depends on jtidy to run its junit tests. Could someone please
remove that dependency from the project descriptor?
Done, removed for both the build and the tests (since they are one
project.)
regards
Adam
Hi,
I need the jaxme api to be added to the dom4j project descriptor. Can
someone do this for me?
thanks,
Maarten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've added a unit test to test some of the STAX functionality of dom4j.
In order to really test this, I need a reference implementation of this
STAX api.
Can someone add the following line to the dom4j project descriptor:
depend project=stax ids=ri/
(please verify this as I'm not very
Hi,
I was taking a look at the dom4j gump descriptor and compared it to the
maven project.xml descriptor of dom4j, and I noticed some old
dependencies that are no longer required by dom4j.
I think the following projects can be removed from the dom4j descriptor
- xml-fop
- xmldb
- tranquilo
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was taking a look at the dom4j gump descriptor and compared it to
the maven project.xml descriptor of dom4j, and I noticed some old
dependencies that are no longer required by dom4j.
I will look into it.
Gump uses Ant to build
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will look into it.
Builds fine without them.
Thanks
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to be some ongoing development.
I've turned msv into a project Gump builds, which was more work than I
had expected since msv's build process is, uhm, strange. dom4j builds
successfully against the Gump built msv on my box.
I'll see what I can do to make the tests run agains both versions
Hi,
it seems that the following paths should be added to the classpath:
./build/classes and .
The ./build/classes contains the dom4j class files and junit
testfiles, the last path is needed for the unit tests to access the
resources in the ./xml directory
But, I don't know how to tell gump how
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems that the following paths should be added to the classpath:
./build/classes and .
The ./build/classes contains the dom4j class files and junit
testfiles, the last path is needed for the unit tests to access the
resources
But, I don't know how to tell gump how to do this.
http://gump.apache.org/metadata/project.html#work
What I don't understand is that these paths are added to the classpath
in the test target of the Ant build.xml file, but gump doesn't seem to
use them. Is this correct? I'm new to gump
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/dom4j/dom4j/index.html shows a failure
at:
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/dom4j/dom4j/gump_file/TEST-org.dom4j.datatype.TestDatatype2.xml.html
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Maarten Coene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gump code and data [EMAIL
Michael Davey wrote:
Maarten Coene wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to send an email to the dom4j-dev emaillist everytime
the build of dom4j fails?
The address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct place for this request. I've
copied this reply
that you know the address you are
subscribed under, in case you later want to unsubscribe or change your
subscription address.
perhaps it should be changed to contain the correct address ?
Michael Davey wrote:
Maarten Coene wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to send an email to the dom4j-dev emaillist
Maarten Coene wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to send an email to the dom4j-dev emaillist everytime
the build of dom4j fails?
The address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct place for this request. I've
copied this reply there.
--
Michael
AM
Subject: Re: [jaxen-interest] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jaxen/jaxen-from-packaged-dom4j
failed
Folks,
Could I make another request to get this small addition made to your
build.xml? I know the correct long term solution is to make the test
pass
but, for that, notification e-mails will still
. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [jaxen-interest] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jaxen/jaxen-from-packaged-dom4j
failed
Folks,
Could I make another request to get this small addition made to your
build.xml? I know the correct long term solution
27 matches
Mail list logo
