"Bill Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>I do not believe it is a regression,but it was also broken on the old
>>vmgump. If you search the archives for log4net , the later entries
"Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I do not believe it is a regression,but it was also broken on the old
>vmgump. If you search the archives for log4net , the later entries should
>describe the issue. If I remember correctly mono places a nant ( lower
I do not believe it is a regression,but it was also broken on the old
vmgump. If you search the archives for log4net , the later entries
should describe the issue. If I remember correctly mono places a nant
( lower case no extension) on the path while gump invokes Nant.exe.
Either should
On Jul 8, 2007, at 7:06 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
Hi all,
See http://140.211.11.135/gump/public/nant/nant/gump_work/
build_nant_nant.html
Who knows something about mono? What's broken? Any volunteer to fix
it?
I see I used a package on Clarus... no I don't know anything about Mono.
How did
Hi all,
See http://140.211.11.135/gump/public/nant/nant/gump_work/
build_nant_nant.html
Who knows something about mono? What's broken? Any volunteer to fix it?
cheers,
Leo Simons
--
http://www.leosimons.com/blog/
-
To uns
