Hi Ted,
I read all your mail ( :-) ) and I am sorry that this evolved into such a
discussion. For me, Linked Data is as specific as Web, Stack or Heap,
and I would claim it is like this for at least the rest of the Web community
and possibly the database community as well. But regardless what
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
I suggest choosing a different name
Selinda comes to mind - as in semantic Linda, and Google doesn't
know it about software.
-Bertrand
-
To
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion Apache
Marmotta as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken
yet, so there would probably no legal issues with the name.
Why Marmotta? It is Italian for marmot, one of the predominant animals in
the
On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion Apache
Marmotta as a new name. We looked a bit and the name seems not to be taken yet, so
there would probably no legal issues with the name.
Why Marmotta? It is Italian
On 19.11.2012 13:15, Benson Margulies wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 19/11/12 11:20, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi all,
we have had a brainstorming round and came up with the suggestion Apache
Marmotta as a new name. We looked a bit and the
On 11/14/12 6:14 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We still have two missing reports: Helix and Syncope. Helix, since
you're only just starting, a very simple report like the one from
Ripple is quite enough for now. Syncope, you already passed the
graduation vote, so there
+1 (binding)
On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in
good shape so I am calling for a vote to accept Streams into the
Incubator.
The proposal is at:
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Franklin, Matthew B.
mfrank...@mitre.orgwrote:
+1 (binding)
On 11/14/12 7:37 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote:
Given the feedback received so far I think the Streams proposal is in
good shape so I am calling for a vote to
Hi Jukka,
Sorry missed this email.
Sounds like you're doing pretty good, and congratulations for the
release! I'm also happy to see many sign-offs on your report.
Thanks
+ Issues that must be addressed before graduation are:
+
+ - Making a release
+ - Attracting users and developers
On 19/11/12 01:01, Benson Margulies wrote:
Ted,
I did read the whole thing, and I'd like to join you in drawing a
curtain in front of the man.
The proposers of this project didn't create the problem of the term
'linked data', and they can't fix it. As you suggest, all they can do
is pick a TLP
Heh yeah I as well had the tuplespace implementation associated with Linda
as I read Apache Linda :) Where Linda itself might have become historic,
the concept still is in use. E.g. [1].
[1]
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1739850CFID=202524342CFTOKEN=19022440
Cheers
Daniel
On Fri, Nov 16,
I second this. Short of the name search these folks are ready to graduate.
Patrick
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Crunch!
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
+ The Crunch
Apache Nuvem will define an open application programming interface
for common cloud application services, allowing applications to be
easily ported across the most popular cloud platforms. It is
currently composed of multiple cloud SCA components (Data, Queue, Chat),
and supports multiple cloud
As far as I know, Lyo is internally discussing and planning to implement
the Linked Data Platform somehow:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations
But I don't have more details, sorry.
Best,
On 16/11/12 19:26, dsh wrote:
Hi,
out of curiosity - how does this relate to or maybe even
Hi,
On 19/11/12 06:53, dsh wrote:
A few comments in regards to the proposal draft and linked data
specifically:
extremely welcome ;-)
* maybe consider calling out that you are striving towards implementing the
Linked Data Platform 1.0 W3C draft (at least that's how I understand the
15 matches
Mail list logo
