Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I can see that most items in the JIRA ticket have been fixed (ie adding jQuery) to LICENSE it’s just not been closed. I checked: - name contains incubating - disclaimer exists - signatures and hash correct - NOTICE good (but year needs updating) - LICENSE is good - Source files

Still need sign off from HAWQ, MADLib

2017-01-12 Thread John D. Ament
Podlings, We still need to get sign off on two reports. Please review these reports. Below is a draft: Incubator PMC report for January 2017 The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts. There are presently

Re: IP Clearance terms

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 7:52 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > IMHO, IP Clearance in of itself is confusing. For software being > > relicensed (under an SGA) it shouldn't be needed. > > Well,

Re: Still need sign off from HAWQ, MADLib

2017-01-12 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Done. Thanks, Roman. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:01 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Podlings, > > We still need to get sign off on two reports. Please review these reports. > > Below is a draft: > > Incubator PMC report for January 2017 > > The Apache Incubator is the entry

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks :) Updated. On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Henri, > > Could you update the proposal for === Mailing Lists === section to list > existing and required mailing lists from Incubator? > > Thanks, > > Henry > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12

Re: [DISCUSS] Staged Artifact Locations (was Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2))

2017-01-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > However, none of our incubator policies talk about this as far as I can > tell. Is this something we actually want to pursue? Also see [1]. > Most TLPs don't do this. Not sure re exact numbers, but there a number that do, or at least they document it that way :-) Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: Add to mxnet-dev; mxnet-private

2017-01-12 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Hi Wang, The mailing list for MXNet will be created when the project is accepted as Apache Incubator Podling. It's under discussion. Thanks, - Tsuyoshi On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Wang Haoran wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm Haoran Wang, one of the member in DMLC. Could

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread 项亮
I would like to volunteer as a committer for MXNet github id: xlvector email: xlvec...@gmail.com Liang Xiang from Toutiao Lab On 2017-01-06 13:12 (+0800), Henri Yandell wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling. > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Myrle Krantz
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:58 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Nazeer, > > Sorry but -1. There was a ticket raised to address release issues in the > prior release vote. The IPMC typically looks to see those release issue > tickets reolved in the following release. > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Zihao Zheng
Hi, could you please add me into the mailing list of this group? I’ve been working on a visualization component(tensorboard ) for MXNet for a while with Eric Junyuan Xie, and would like to contribute more on this direction. GitHub ID: zihaolucky Email:

Add to mxnet-dev; mxnet-private

2017-01-12 Thread Wang Haoran
Hi, I'm Haoran Wang, one of the member in DMLC. Could you please add this address to the mailing list of mxnet. Thanks, Haoran

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread 项亮
I would like to be committer of Mxnet Github ID: xlvector xlvector#gmail.com Affiliations: Toutiao - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Tsuyoshi Ozawa
Hi Henri, My previous comment was just a review comment against the proposal, but I forgot to mentioning importance thing. > Currently the list of committers is based on the current active coders, so > we're also very interested in hearing from anyone else who is interested in > working on the

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Terry Chen
Hello, I would like to be committer of MxNet Github ID: terrychenism Email: terrychen2...@live.com Affiliations: Novumind Best, Terry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Terry Chen
Hello, I would like to be committer of MxNet Github ID: terrychenism Email: terrychen2...@live.com Affiliations: Novumind Best, Terry - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Terry Chen
Hello, I would like to be committer of MxNet Github ID: terrychenism Email: terrychen2...@live.com Affiliations: Novumind Best, Terry On 2017-01-05 21:12 (-0800), Henri Yandell wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet podling.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Nazeer Shaik
Thank you Justin reviewing the release. We will add suggested details in readme file. Let me discuss with Fineract mentors about spring boot version. Thanks, Nazeer On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I can see that most items

[DISCUSS] Staged Artifact Locations (was Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2))

2017-01-12 Thread John D. Ament
So this issue pops up in a lot of podling votes. Next time could you please: - Place the artefacts for voting on in [1] that way they can be released with an svn mv command. However, none of our incubator policies talk about this as far as I can tell. Is this something we actually want to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 2:23 AM Nazeer Shaik wrote: > Hi John, > > Thank you for reviewing this release. > > 1) I have kept https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 open as > we have addressed 4 out of 6 suggestions given for 0.5.0-incubating > release. Other

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > My struggle is that you have a build directory in one of the child dirs. > There is no top level build - as a result, there's no easy way to run rat > from the root. This means that there are a number of files not easily > verified. Yep it’s a little less than ideal and may mean that the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Nazeer Shaik
Hi John, We have closed the Jira issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 and created two separate jira issues for remaining two items.RAT is integrated such a way it will check all directories and files from top level directory. So nothing will be missed. Thanks, Nazeer On Thu,

Re: IP Clearance terms

2017-01-12 Thread John D. Ament
IMHO, IP Clearance in of itself is confusing. For software being relicensed (under an SGA) it shouldn't be needed. In addition, like any other podling coming in, work may be needed to generate a valid release from the donation. It may not just work. So i'd actually prefer to just drop the two

FOSDEM 2017 Open Source Conference - Brussels

2017-01-12 Thread Sharan F
Hello Everyone This email is to tell you about ASF participation at FOSDEM. The event will be held in Brussels on 4^th & 5^th February 2017 and we are hoping that many people from our ASF projects will be there. https://fosdem.org/2017/ Attending FOSDEM is completely free and the ASF will

Re: IP Clearance terms

2017-01-12 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:06 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > IMHO, IP Clearance in of itself is confusing. For software being > relicensed (under an SGA) it shouldn't be needed. Well, it is needed, even where that devolves to "has all SGA paperwork for this incoming

Re: [DISCUSS] Staged Artifact Locations (was Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2))

2017-01-12 Thread Josh Elser
IMO, it prevents a one-line release command for Maven projects using the standard conventions (I'm blindly assuming is Maven is the most common tool used). However, I can also see where Justin is coming from with the provenance side of things (the disconnect between what was voted on and what

[VOTE] Impala 2.8.0 release candidate 1

2017-01-12 Thread Jim Apple
Impala 2.8.0 release candidate 1 has passed a PPMC vote; this email is a call for an IPMC vote. The PPMC vote thread is: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f873d0f82f0619d7d9a18440a74ea2961e63e4db0c5216a9d08b6517@%3Cdev.impala.apache.org%3E

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Fineract 0.6.0 (incubating)

2017-01-12 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1. Thx! > On Jan 12, 2017, at 7:36 AM, Nazeer Shaik wrote: > > Hi John, > > We have closed the Jira issue > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357 and created two separate > jira issues for remaining two items.RAT is integrated such a way it will > check

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Added :) On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:37 AM, Terry Chen wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to be committer of MxNet > > Github ID: terrychenism > Email: terrychen2...@live.com > Affiliations: Novumind > > > Best, > Terry > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Added :) On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:43 PM, 项亮 wrote: > I would like to volunteer as a committer for MXNet > > github id: xlvector > email: xlvec...@gmail.com > > Liang Xiang from Toutiao Lab > > On 2017-01-06 13:12 (+0800), Henri Yandell wrote: > > Hello

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Added :) On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > Hi Henri, > > My previous comment was just a review comment against the proposal, > but I forgot to mentioning importance thing. > > > Currently the list of committers is based on the current active coders, > so

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henri Yandell
Added :) On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:57 PM, Zihao Zheng wrote: > Hi, could you please add me to this group? I’ve been working on a > visualization component(tensorboard ) > for MXNet for a while with Eric Junyuan Xie, and would like to

Re: [DISCUSS] Staged Artifact Locations (was Re: [VOTE] Release Gossip version gossip-0.1.1-incubating (RC2))

2017-01-12 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > IMO, it prevents a one-line release command for Maven projects using the > standard conventions (I'm blindly assuming is Maven is the most common tool > used). However, I can also see where Justin is coming from with the >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposing MXNet for the Apache Incubator

2017-01-12 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Henri, Could you update the proposal for === Mailing Lists === section to list existing and required mailing lists from Incubator? Thanks, Henry On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Hello Incubator, > > I'd like to propose a new incubator Apache MXNet