[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Hi Bertrand, > On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:20 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >> I apologize for coming late to this discussion, but longstanding policy >> is to accept either

Druid 0.12.0 release (pre incubation)

Hi incubators, Druid was recently accepted into the incubator (yay) - I now want to bring up a release vote we already had in progress and that we expect to complete early next week: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/druid-development/sK777vmZcR0/discussion. Since this release is likely just days

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

Hi, -1 (binding) as there’s BSD and other license information in the NOTICE file. Also in general only relocated copyright lines need to be included in NOTICE [1] not the copyright of permissive bundled software. [2] The full license text is not included in the license file. I checked: -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi Justin, I mentioned this in my vote: "* We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating" The content looks OK to me, but not in the right place/formating. I didn't consider this as blocker (as it's there, even if not super accurate) and we can fix in the next cycle, but I got your

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi, > "* We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating” IMO It needs more than minor improvements/changes, it's not just a formatting issue. That being said no -1 vote is a veto if you get 3 +1 votes from other IPMC members then it’s a release. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi., For those not wanting to download the release and unpack it, here's the current NOTICE file [1] You’ll note it contains permissive license information (which should be in the license file), links to web sites rather than pointers to license text (license information can change over time

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

Hi, The vote for releasing Apache Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating is now closed. With a total of +5 binding votes and no -1 votes, the vote passes. +1s (binding): Sijie Justin Stian Andrews Jim Thanks a lot to all the reviewers for taking the time to validate this release! Regards, Jai On Fri,

Re: Druid 0.12.0 release (pre incubation)

As a mentor of Druid, sounds good to me. It’s good to keep on releasing regularly - the community relies on it. Please mention this in the board report (due in about a week). When will the next release be, and will you be able to make that under the incubator process? Julian > On Mar 2,

Re: Druid 0.12.0 release (pre incubation)

Thanks for the advice Julian. For our next release after 0.12.0, with our normal schedule we would look to start doing release candidates later this month and aim for a final release in April / May (Druid release candidates usually bake for a month or so). Whether we could do those release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi, > I just checked some projects Notice file, it looks like some projects[1][2] > list the License information about the third party dependencies in the > Notice file Which would be incorrect to do so. What you are seeing here in the Hadoop case is an upstream project have extra information

Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

As always Sebb thank you for your advice and quick response. On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:27 AM sebb wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 11:41, Carlos Santana wrote: > > Thanks sebb > > > > What do we do with “Apache Tentacles cannot support tar.gz” > > Never used

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes correct - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE good - all source files have ASF headers - no unexpected binary files I noticed a minor issue is that LICENSE is missing the MIT license for this file [1] Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Justin, Thank you for verification! Will certainly fix `font-awesome.css` issue in the next release. Makoto 2018-03-03 12:40 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > +1 (binding) > > I checked: > - incubating in name > - signatures and hashes correct > - disclaimer exists

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

?On 25 February 2018 at 23:36, Jai Asher wrote: > This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version > 1.22.0-incubating. > > It fixes the following issues: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pulsar/milestone/11?closed=1 > > *** Please download, test and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SensSoft (Incubating) UserALE.js 1.0.0 RC#1

Hi, +1 binding There’s a minor thing in LICENSE that needs fixing. I checked: - signatures and hashes are good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE appendix includes incorrect copyright - NOTICE is good - No unexpected binary files - No sure if "compile from source" counts here :-) Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi, -1 (binding) as there is incorrect and far too much information in NOTICE. License information goes in LICENSE not NOTICE. [1] Also only things that are actually bundled need to be mentioned not dependancies. [2] BTW it's not entirely clear which of the releases artefacts are source

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

Hi, +1 binding A minor issue the NOTICE year need updating. I checked: - incubating in name - hashes and signatures good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is good - NOTICE year is last year - can compile from source Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

+1 binding Reviewed license and release artifacts / signatures. Tim On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:05 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Reviewed: > * build from src > * ASF headers > * checksum and signatures > * DISCLAIMER > * License is OK > * We can do a minor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

+1 (binding) Reviewed: * build from src * ASF headers * checksum and signatures * DISCLAIMER * License is OK * We can do a minor improvement on the NOTICE formating Thanks ! Regards JB On 02/28/2018 02:25 PM, Mohammad Asif Siddiqui wrote: > Hello All, > > This is a call for vote to release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0 Release Candidate 3

Hi IPMC members, It's already 72 hours passed. We need two more votes from IPMC members. Could anyone in IPMC volunteer help verifying our release? With a prepared docker image, just type the following commands to run Rat check: $ docker run -it hivemall/verify:v0.5.0-rc3 $ wget

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

+1 - Verified signatures - Ran simple producer & consumer against the binary distribution - Compiled the src distribution, ran unit tests and ran sample producer/consumer test against it - OS version: MacOS 10.12.6 - I had to update "advertisedAddress=" to localhost in conf/standalone.conf to

Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

On 2 March 2018 at 04:28, Carlos Santana wrote: > Forwarding to Incubator mailing list to see if they any guidance. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ying Chun Guo > Date: Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 PM > Subject: Two issues with license

Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

Thanks sebb What do we do with “Apache Tentacles cannot support tar.gz” How are others dealing with this? Are you using Tentacles or another tool in your releases? — Carlks On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM sebb wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 04:28, Carlos Santana

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar 1.22.0-incubating Release Candidate 3

+1 (binding) > On Mar 2, 2018, at 3:17 AM, Andrews Sahaya Albert > wrote: > > +1 > > - Verified signatures > - Ran simple producer & consumer against the binary distribution > - Compiled the src distribution, ran unit tests and ran sample > producer/consumer test

Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

Probably a similar response - raise a ticket to Tentacles https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TENTACLES/issues FWIW, this is the first I'm ever hearing of this project. John On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:41 AM Carlos Santana wrote: > Thanks sebb > > What do we do with

Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

On 2 March 2018 at 11:41, Carlos Santana wrote: > Thanks sebb > > What do we do with “Apache Tentacles cannot support tar.gz” Never used it, but here are some suggestions: Provide a patch to the project. Unpack the archive and check it manually Unpack the archive and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ServiceComb Service-Center (incubating) version 1.0.0-m1

Hi Justin Thanks for the vote, here is some thing that I want to clear about the NOTICE file. I just checked some projects Notice file, it looks like some projects[1][2] list the License information about the third party dependencies in the Notice file, and some of them[3] just list bundled