> - When you say "open source" repo, do you mean private repo vs public
> repo?
Yes.
>
> - I believe Craig as Secretary will say an SGA never hurts but isn't
> everything already licensed ASLv2? It's been a few weeks and a few
> proposals reviewed so it could be my memory.
Currently, the
Well, first, let's ask some questions:
- When you say "open source" repo, do you mean private repo vs public
repo?
- I believe Craig as Secretary will say an SGA never hurts but isn't
everything already licensed ASLv2? It's been a few weeks and a few
proposals reviewed so it could be my memory.
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM Michael Wall wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:03 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 03:07, Ryan Blue wrote:
> >
> > > The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose
> > accepting
I will defer the intake of code to the secretary.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 12:20 黄向东 > - When you say "open source" repo, do you mean private repo vs public
> > repo?
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> > - I believe Craig as Secretary will say an SGA never hurts but isn't
> > everything already licensed ASLv2? It's
+1 to the new proposals.
The key is to have new potential members to be VOTED in to IPMCs, meaning
someone from existing IPMC should have know the criteria to be invited.
- Henry
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:20 AM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I looked at the board resolution for the creation
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:03 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 03:07, Ryan Blue wrote:
>
> > The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose
> accepting
> > the Iceberg project for incubation.
> >
> > The proposal is copied below and in the
+1 (binding)
- Checksum and signature look good
- L & N files look okay
- DISCLAIMER present
- ASF headers present
- No wayward binaries
(Note I didn’t try to build, I just examined that source package.)
-Taylor
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Neng Lu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is the 5th
Hi,
- CloudPickle has NOTICE requirements where the copyrights should be.
> Please fix in the next release.
>
What are these? BSD licensed software has no NOTICE requirements. The
copyright statements are included in BSD license file and that's where they
should be copied to our pointed at from
I believe in the LICENSE file, we have this information:
Third party BSD 3-Clause licenses
The following components are provided under the BSD
+1 (binding)
I checked the signature and checksum.
I did a rat check and there are no unexpected binaries.
- Note CONTRIBUTING.md is a link to a not included file. Please fix in the next
release.
- CloudPickle has NOTICE requirements where the copyrights should be. Please
fix in the next
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked the signature and checksum.
> I did a rat check and there are no unexpected binaries.
> - Note CONTRIBUTING.md is a link to a not included file. Please fix in the
> next release.
> - CloudPickle has NOTICE
Hi
+1, I am chairman of TLP project and has been involved multiple incubating
projects from start to finish, also was responsible for multiple releases as
manager.
I would be glad to give help if some new incubator projects require.
Regards
Liang
Justin Mclean wrote
> Hi,
>
> I looked at
Hi,
In the proposal discussion process, we got 3 mentors, Justin Mclean,
Christofer Dutz, and Willem Ning Jiang.
In the vote process, we got a new mentor, Joe Witt.
Totally, there are one Champion and four mentors, they are:
Kevin A. McGrail (the Champion),
Justin Mclean,
Christofer Dutz,
Here is a question for the source code repository
The main source git repo[1] is still a private repo. I think we need
to open source the repo before sending the SGA?
[1]https://github.com/thulab/iotdb
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:08 PM hxd
+1
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 03:07, Ryan Blue wrote:
> The discuss thread seems to have reached consensus, so I propose accepting
> the Iceberg project for incubation.
>
> The proposal is copied below and in the wiki:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IcebergProposal
>
> Please vote on whether
Currently, there are 6 repositories (IoTDB, IoTDB-JDBC, TsFile,
Spark-Connector, Hive-Connector, and Grafana-Connector) totally and we will
merge them all in one repositories.
Only the first one is private.
Actually we are lack of experiences about how to open source.
Should we open all
16 matches
Mail list logo
