Hi, even though my vote is non-binding, as a member of the PPMC I vote:
[ ] +1 approve
Please support our effort to get this release out.
Thanks
Brian
On 21/08/2019, 16:10, "John McCane-Whitney" wrote:
Hi,
This is a call to vote to release the Apache Milagro (incubating)
Hi,
> Sorry for my top post, but I have some observations about your “guide”.
> (1) It is more a mentoring FAQ than a guide.
Yep agree, and happy to change the name. I was hoping in time it could be
fleshed out with more general guidance, but that’s probably a long way off.
> (2) You are
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- No unexpected binary files
- Code compiles and tests successfully run for both ones
One comment: DISCLAIMER files should be tidied up to be more readable at
next release i.e.:
Hi Justin,
> On Aug 21, 2019, at 10:42 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
...
>> Oh, mentors, quick question about the [RESULT] post, do I account for both
>> threads (dev@+general@) in it, or just the general@ one?
>
> Just the IPMC votes.
My understanding of best practice is to combine
Thanks, Furkan! We'll get on the disclaimer clean-up asap.
On 22/08/2019, 10:47, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me.
I checked:
- Incubating in name
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE is fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- No unexpected binary files
- Code
I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing anything of
import. I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new hash,
and let everyone know. I don't see any reason to drag back through the
voting process on two lists over this.
Alan.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43
Hi,
At the recent board meeting, the board has informally approved the use of the
DISCLAIMER-WIP.
If you use the DISCLAIMER-WIP disclaimer [1] you can make an ASF release that
doesn't need to follow ASF release policy. You will need to list the reason why
in this disclaimer. By the time you
Hi,
The september report [1] timeline is:
Wed September 05Podling reports due by end of day
Sun September 09Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun September 09Summary due by end of day
Tue September 11Mentor signoff due by end of
Hi IPMC,
The Apache Ratis community has voted and approved the proposal to
release Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3. We now kindly
request the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this
source-only incubator release.
Apache Ratis is an open source Java implementation for RAFT
Hi,
I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change I
would prefer another Vote to have this checked.
If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I think
everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so its just
about
Transferring my vote from the dev@ratis vote thread.
+1 (binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures.
- Verified release source matches git release tag.
- Built from source
- Ran unit tests which passed
- Ran file store example
Regards,
Arpit
> On Aug 22, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh
+Mukul
> On Aug 22, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Arpit Agarwal wrote:
>
> Transferring my vote from the dev@ratis vote thread.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Verified checksums and signatures.
> - Verified release source matches git release tag.
> - Built from source
> - Ran unit tests which passed
> - Ran
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes match
- checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE
- No unexpected binary
- Can compile from source on macOS Mojave
Julian
Am 21.08.19, 05:15 schrieb "Justin Mclean" :
Hi,
+1 (binding)
I checked:
-
Hi,
-1 (binding) as the release is not in the correct place [1] and NOTICE is not
correct. [2][3]
I checked:
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is OK
- NOTICE need more work and incorrectly includes unnecessary copyright
statements.
- all have source files ASF headers
- no
It's odd that this is addressed to mentors, rather than the podlings
themselves. However, is the new disclaimer-wip meant to be shown within
the release or on the podlings website or both?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:05 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the recent board meeting, the board has
HI,
Oops I most of copied the wrong dates - here are the correct ones:
Wed September 04 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun September 08 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun September 08 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue September 10 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
Hi,
> It's odd that this is addressed to mentors, rather than the podlings
> themselves.
I’m expecting that mentor will pass this information on to podlings that would
need to use it.
> However, is the new disclaimer-wip meant to be shown within
> the release or on the podlings website or
Hi,
Does anyone think we should mail this out to all incubating PMC? (e.g private@
or dev@). I'm not really sure that I want to spam 50 odd projects like that,
but it woful be useful in getting this knowledge out there.
Thanks,
Justin
+1 (binding)
Validated signature for source tar.
Downloaded and built the source.
Ran filestore loadgen example successfully.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:53 AM Arpit Agarwal
wrote:
> +Mukul
>
> > On Aug 22, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Arpit Agarwal
> wrote:
> >
> > Transferring my vote from the
Hi,
Just a note to say page has moved to:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Mentor+FAQ
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi
I will start the proposal vote soon. Thank everyone's support.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Apache SkyWalking, Apache ShardingSphere(Incubating), Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108
Sheng Wu 于2019年8月20日周二 上午9:56写道：
> Proposal name changed, new WIKI page link,
>
Hi all,
After the discussion of DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) proposal
(discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d3ac53bddf91391e54f63d042a0b3d60f2aecfbb99780bcc00b4db6e@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
),
I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator.
22 matches
Mail list logo
