Re: [PROPOSAL] Samza Proposal

2013-07-24 Thread Lars Francke
Hi, interesting proposal! > If you guys are interested, I have much more in-depth documents comparing > and contrasting Samza with MUPD8 and Storm. I for one would be very interested in those documents. Cheers, Lars - To unsub

Re: [DISCUSS] CarbonData incubation proposal

2016-05-19 Thread Lars Francke
Hi Jean-Baptiste, can you - or anyone else for that matter - comment on how it relates to Parquet and ORC? The Github page says "The CaronData file format provides a highly efficient way to store structured data,it was designed to overcome limitations of the other Hadoop file formats." so it'd be

Re: [DISCUSS] Spot Incubation Proposal

2016-09-13 Thread Lars Francke
Thank you Doug. On a cursory look this seems related to the currently incubating Metron project. The documentation on both projects is relatively scarce. Do you happen to have any insight on overlap between those two or am I completely off here by comparing those two? On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:50

Re: Request to join the IPMC

2018-07-12 Thread Lars Francke
I'm happy to start a new thread as well but I thought I might as well join in this one. I'm also a member and would love to join the Incubator PMC. I haven't been as active as I'd like but I hope that'll change :) On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch>

Re: [DISCUSS] Iceberg proposal for incubation

2018-11-13 Thread Lars Francke
I've been following the Iceberg project on and off for a while now and I think this is desperately needed. I don't claim to understand all of the details but I'm very happy to hear this being proposed for Apache. I think it'd be a great fit. Thank you Ryan and everyone else working on this so far.

Re: [VOTE] Accept the Iceberg project for incubation

2018-11-14 Thread Lars Francke
+1 (binding) On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:48 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Great to see this here! > > > Am 14.11.2018 um 04:07 schrieb James Taylor : > > > > +1 (binding) > > > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 4:15 PM Willem Jiang > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (binding) > >> > >> Willem Jiang >

Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-17 Thread Lars Francke
Hi, I'd like to start a discussion around establishing a project (or Central Service) at the ASF to host and develop training and related materials for ASF (and possibly others, where it makes sense) projects. I'm a committer and contributor to a few projects and make money doing consulting work.

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-17 Thread Lars Francke
le are reading here as well. I'm not opposed to start it as a top-level project. I'll defer to people with a longer ASF history. I'm not sure about the precedent but I know that it sometimes happens. > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:23 AM Lars Francke > wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-17 Thread Lars Francke
he Incubator. It's not a Thing Like That. Perhaps a proposal > to > the Board to create a top-level thing? I'll put a pointer to this > thread > into that other thread (referenced above), and apologies to those of > you > who are not ASF Members and cannot s

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-17 Thread Lars Francke
ted parties to discuss things further. Please let > me know if you would be interested and if you recommend anyone else is > invited for the meeting. > > Thanks for your time. > > Regards, > > KAM > On 12/17/2018 8:22 AM, Lars Francke wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-18 Thread Lars Francke
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:23 PM Lars Francke > wrote: > > ...we do not believe that a slide-deck is worth > > that much on its own... > > I agree but I think t

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-19 Thread Lars Francke
Would I have to propose this on members@ as Sally just did in the thread that Rich referred to earlier? On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:47 PM Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/18/2018 11:43 AM, Lars Francke wrote: > > You, Rich and KAM talk about a TLP/Central Service so let's start > &g

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2018-12-20 Thread Lars Francke
Great, thanks for the feedback. I'll work on that in the next few days! Happy holidays everyone, Lars On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:37 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:00 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > ...Even with direct to TLP it might be go

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

2019-01-09 Thread Lars Francke
ommunity development/growth/education, it's > also > > sufficiently different that it may need to be independent. > > > > What are next steps? I don't *think* this is something that should go > > through the Incubator. It's not a Thing Like

Edit Permissions for Incubator Wiki

2019-01-14 Thread Lars Francke
Hi, I'd like to add the proposal for the Apache Training project. Could you please grant me edit permissions for the Incubator Wiki? The user name is "LarsFrancke". Thank you, Lars

Re: Edit Permissions for Incubator Wiki

2019-01-14 Thread Lars Francke
Thank you very much for the prompt response. It works. I'll add the proposal this week. On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:04 PM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 9:54 AM Lars Francke > wrote: > > ...The user name is "LarsF

[DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-25 Thread Lars Francke
Hello everyone, this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1]. I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we've been working on for a project focused on developing training material for Apache & 3rd party projects. The full proposal can be found here < h

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-26 Thread Lars Francke
Justin, that's great to hear. And yes please. I'll add you to the Wiki. Cheers, Lars On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 12:35 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’ll comment on the other parts of the proposal once I’ve thought about it > a bit, but I’m also have a decent amount of training and course crea

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-26 Thread Lars Francke
t Open Source Development. I would > like to share my experiences and be on the (P)PMC/initial committer list > too. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:04 PM Lars Francke > wrote: > > > Justin, > > > > that's great to hear. A

Meritocracy, initial contributors and (Incubator) Proposals

2019-01-26 Thread Lars Francke
Hello everyone, I should have thought of this before, but I didn't. I also did some research in the mailing list archives, but the search terms are so common, I didn't come up with anything. Meritocracy is valued strongly at the ASF. Usually it is granted post-fact when someone has proven her- or

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-26 Thread Lars Francke
gt; company named as LAGOM which works on Big Data and Machine Learning and >> contributes to open source projects. >> >> I am a blogger and public speaker about Open Source Development. I would >> like to share my experiences and be on the (P)PMC/initial committer lis

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-28 Thread Lars Francke
y > development effort (internally and externally), but also because I have an > real interest in developing documentation and training material. > > So I'd be happy to be involved. > > Thanks > Sharan > > On 2019/01/25 12:49:01, Lars Francke wrote: > > Hello everyon

Re: Meritocracy, initial contributors and (Incubator) Proposals

2019-01-28 Thread Lars Francke
M Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi Lars, > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 5:35 PM Lars Francke > wrote: > > ...Proposals (and this especially) are a way to be granted something > that you > > usually have to work for (prove merit) > > I a

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-28 Thread Lars Francke
ion ask and assess current PMC members and see if everyone has proven their merit and is willing to continue * TLP: Start with a PMC consisting of only ASF members (plus additional committers) and then accept additional members for the PMC on a "normal" basis Cheers, Lars On Fri, Jan

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-01-29 Thread Lars Francke
ussion as a member of the (P)PMC. The idea of an open > source project to help rationalize training materials is very appealing. > > I'm also very interested in the ecosystem of not-for-profit education and > I think this project would be a great fit. > > Craig > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-04 Thread Lars Francke
on > > and > > blog about The Apache Way. I also assist newcomers joining Apache Ignite. > > So count on my support, and I definitely would like to became committer > at > > Training. > > > > Sincerely, > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > ср, 30 янв. 201

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-04 Thread Lars Francke
anguages. https://training.apache.org etc. Are there any issues with that? On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:20 AM Lars Francke wrote: > Dmitry, Kenneth, > > sorry for the slow replies. I was offline on vacation for a few days. I'll > add both of you to the Wiki (if you haven't alre

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-04 Thread Lars Francke
five years and we would like > to > > contribute those. I for myself have not been directly involved with the > ASF > > directly, however I have been contributing to some open source projects > in > > the past. We have been in discussion about this with Lars Francke and

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-07 Thread Lars Francke
Hello everyone, discussion seems to have died down. Before moving on I'd really like to hear the opinions of the interested contributors on which direction to go. Otherwise we might have to put it to a vote? Cheers, Lars On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:52 AM Lars Francke wrote: > Dmitr

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-08 Thread Lars Francke
Thanks to the three of you. Those arguments make sense to me and we indeed have a few "newcomers" with us (that includes me in a non-committer role) so I've changed my opinion and think the Incubator way would be the best. I'll edit the Wiki proposal (and add Christofer whom I've forgotten, sorry

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

2019-02-08 Thread Lars Francke
One more thing: We've got three mentors. If anyone else would like to volunteer we won't say no :) I've used the E-Mail addresses from your mails in the proposal. Feel free to update to an @apache.org address if you want to. On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:05 AM Lars Francke wrote:

[VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-12 Thread Lars Francke
Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the new "Training" project as a podling in the Apache Incubator. A vote for accepting a new Ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-13 Thread Lars Francke
I'll also add my +1 (binding) On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:25 AM Sönke Liebau wrote: > +1 (non-binding) excited about moving this forward! :) > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 9:20 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding) woking forward to being involved. > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-13 Thread Lars Francke
gt; > > > > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > > > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > > > <(703)%20798-0171> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, F

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-18 Thread Lars Francke
you, Lars On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:57 AM Lars Francke wrote: > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-18 Thread Lars Francke
rd to this. > > > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 11:11 AM Woonsan Ko wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Cool! > > > > > > Woonsan > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:58 AM Lars Francke > > > wrote: >

Incubator Git vs SVN

2019-02-18 Thread Lars Francke
I'm trying to read up as much as I can on the Incubator (podling startup) processes and it took me surprisingly long to find the podlings.xml file that's referred to in some places. This lead me to dig into the SVN structure and I found that the Incubator also has a Git repository. Can someone cl

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-19 Thread Lars Francke
gt; > On Feb 19, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > >> On Feb 13, 2019, at 2:57 AM, Lars Francke > wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> we've discussed the proposal for the Training proje

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-19 Thread Lars Francke
I have added Jim. If there are any objections to this please let me know. I'm now going to count the votes. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:29 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck guys > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:58 PM Lars Francke > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-19 Thread Lars Francke
d make this official. Thanks for voting! 21 binding +1 votes: Bernd Fondermann Bertrand Delacretaz Christofer Dutz Felix Cheung Furkan Kamaci . Henry Saputra Jim Jagielski Justin Mclean Kenneth Knowles Kevin A. McGrail . Lars Francke Liang Chen Matt Sicker Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Myrle Krantz . Paul Kin

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-21 Thread Lars Francke
No more comments. So: The vote is closed. Thank you everyone. We now have a "Training (incubating)" project at the ASF! Justin seems to have gone ahead and started the process of getting resources created already. On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 8:57 AM Lars Francke wrote: > The vote

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

2019-02-22 Thread Lars Francke
The mailing lists have been created and we're good to go. Please send a mail to dev-subscr...@training.apache.org if you want to subscribe and would like to join the discussion. On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:10 AM Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:45 AM Gosling Von wrote: > > > +1 bindi

Re: Changes to Website and Marking As Obsolete SVN Version of Incubator Website

2019-02-28 Thread Lars Francke
Yes please, thank you! I asked about this a few weeks ago as this had me very confused! < https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42cd652f4621d55d5de51c5e84b39c1677ef92310e6f626a3b794574@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > I’ve been re

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-03-01 Thread Lars Francke
If only some people are like me they joined to support a specific podling by giving their +1 on a vote. I did the same, then went silent for a year or so and am only now starting to get interested in the Incubator workings again. Maybe if we could change the requirements on binding votes for podli

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-03-01 Thread Lars Francke
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:05 PM Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:00 AM Lars Francke > wrote: > >... > > > As far as I know every member can become IPMC member. So if we change the > > rules that every member vote is binding (whether or not they are in th

Re: Whimsy general@ subs check (was: [DISCUSS] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling non-ASF release candidates)

2019-03-01 Thread Lars Francke
x27;s no merit involved (other than the merit that needs to be proven to become a member in the first place). But there's a good chance I still misunderstand. Cheers, Lars On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 4:20 PM Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 9:04 AM Lars Francke > wrote: &

Re: March Board report

2019-03-07 Thread Lars Francke
Hi Justin, not sure if you want us to edit typos etc. directly or whether you want them listed here? Cheers, Lars On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:06 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > While I'm yet to fill in some of the mechanical items (releases and the > like) some feedback on the report would be

Re: [VOTE] introduce "[DISCUSS]" threads for podling releases

2019-03-13 Thread Lars Francke
+1 (binding) Just one question: Where/how do you plan on documenting this? On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:53 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > +1 from me too! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:50 AM 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > > > Amendment: > > > "A non-ASF release > > >

Re: List of Projects that went straight to Top Level Projects

2019-04-01 Thread Lars Francke
> > > Straight to TLP: > Bahir, DRAT, Kibble, Orc, Serf, STeVe, Whimsy, Zest > ORC was spun out of Hive as far as I remember.

Re: Podling report due

2019-05-03 Thread Lars Francke
I just added Training. We had it prepared and I just forgot to copy it over, sorry. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:46 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > We’re still missing: > Milagro > Toree > > Mentors please remind your podlings that it needs to be in today. Milagro > missed reporting last month as

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache StreamPieps to a TLP

2022-11-08 Thread Lars Francke
+1 (binding) On Sun, Nov 6, 2022 at 10:32 PM Dominik Riemer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > following the [DISCUSS] thread at [0], I'd like to call a vote to graduate > StreamPipes to a TLP. > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1 Apache StreamPipes (incubating) is ready to graduate from the > Apache

Re: [MENTORS] Late podling reports

2023-06-14 Thread Lars Francke
Hi Calvin, I'm really sorry about the missing training report. We did submit one for April. It's been so long for me but I thought once per quarter was enough? Can you remind me again please. Cheers, Lars On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 1:33 PM Calvin Kirs wrote: > > Hi, > > We are missing reports from

Re: Access to Incubator Wiki - Submission of Podling report - Apache Training

2023-07-05 Thread Lars Francke
demarks> > > The name search process has not yet been started, as there is still time to > do that if and when graduation draws nearer. > > The PPMC is actively monitoring usage of the Podlings current name on other > sites. > > The Podling is not dire

Re: Write Access to submit Podling Report

2023-08-02 Thread Lars Francke
Hi Mirko, as Justin mentioned last time: Only PPMC members can submit the report. I'm on holiday right now but I'll ping Chris if he can help move it over. Cheers, Lars On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:34 AM Mirko Kämpf wrote: > Hello ASF Admins, > > I try another attempt to submit a podling report

Re: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin

2019-06-19 Thread Lars Francke
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:22 AM Sheng Wu wrote: > Hi > > This is a call for official vote of Zipkin leave from incubator, and > return back to OpenZipkin. > > PPMC have voted.[1], carried two IPMC +1 vote from Sheng Wu and Willem > Jiang > > There is no trademark, logo transfer, so,

Re: overzealous bureaucracy (was: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin)

2019-06-20 Thread Lars Francke
This was also discussed on the ASF slack during which I suggested (this is not fully thought through) to change the Incubator model to focus on its core tenets of providing services to projects wanting to join the ASF. For this cause, the projects itself don't need to be ASF projects (not even Apac

Re: overzealous bureaucracy (was: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin)

2019-06-20 Thread Lars Francke
wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 9:38 AM Lars Francke > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is very much not thought through to the end. One question > raised > > > for > > > > > exa

Re: Donation of subproject for PLC4X

2019-10-07 Thread Lars Francke
Hi, while a name search is not necessary I'm sure you're aware that there's already an Apache Crunch project which _might_ confuse people even though this is supposed to become a subproject. I don't know anything about the project but some subprojects are later spun out as TLPs. I'm not sure if Cr