Hi ,
I'm request for the karma to editing podling report wiki.
Could anyone please grant me that?
My wiki username: sospartan
Thanks.
Best Regards!
------
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017, sospartan wrote:
>
>> I'm request for the karma to editing podling report wiki.
>> My wiki username: sospartan
>>
>
> Karma
EX-26
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
------
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
f a vote thread.
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
e, and think that the approach taken by
> > > Weex
> > > > is
> > > > > > appropriate.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I disagree. I think you're thinking of source release vs binary
> > > release.
> > > > > Weex has only presented a source release.
> > > >
> > > > I am aware of that, but the documentation says "make it easier for
> the
> > > > downstream" and by "excluding all non-bundled, but required,
> > dependencies
> > > > from NOTICE" we actually make it harder for the downstream. And
> sorry,
> > I
> > > > place "common sense" and "tribal knowledge" way over someone writing
> a
> > > > documentation and perhaps didn't realize the consequences. I never
> stop
> > > > thinking, just because I read something somewhere.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > I'm not sure what a valid response to this would be. I don't believe
> we
> > > should be taking into account ease of use for downstream consumers,
> > however
> > > at the end of the day those downstream consumers of a source release
> > > eventually get a binary and that binary should include proper data.
> > What I
> > > am trying to say is that these contents look more appropriate for the
> > > binary release, which would be a satisfactory use case for downstream
> > > consumers.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > --
> > > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > > > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
E
>
> Hopefully this is the one you meant... Pinging your mentors in the future
> might be better to avoid any chance of accidentally leaking some private
> context :)
>
> - Josh
>
> sospartan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> May I ask who has karma to view archives of podl
gt; > On Apr 24, 2017, at 7:02 PM, sospartan wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that the RESULT I need. Thank you.
> > But It's empty in content when I open this address.
> > I want make sure. So, Is there a specific rule that committer can not
> view
> > these archives of priva
EX-26
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
------
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
oject?
>
> Well, you just introduced more complexity in "using the project" with your
> insistence on no binaries, and more so if your "no execute flag" is also
> now not allowed. AFAIK, there is no obligation that the source distribution
> must contain all details needed to build the project, only that it can be
> built. But for you convenience;
>
> 1. Install Gradle and learn how to use it.
> 2. Install Maven and learn how to use it.
> 3. Install Android NDK and learn how to use it.
> 4. Install Android SDK and learn how to use it.
> 5. Install Xcode and learn how to use it.
> 6. Install IOS SDK and learn how to use it.
> 7. Build each part with the tool needed.
>
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
; wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> BUT ALSO figuring out what to start looking for. For fak sake,
> >>>> man Get a grip on reality!
> >>>
> >>> Craig L Russell
> >>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> >>> c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> >> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
download would be made available through the various jar
> > repos (e.g. mvnrepository). This should (preferably) be done by the
> Gradle
> > community/organisation. However, in the short term, the project could
> > adjust the gradlew scripts in the codebase to have that in
emain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
https://weex-project.io
Could anyone from IPMC review this release?
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:23 PM, sospartan wrote:
> Hi IPMC,
>
> I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
> In this release, source tarball only include files necessary to build Weex
> SDK.
> All binaries w
contributors are new to ASF, we are still try to learn the
apache-way.
Especially, there are lots issues about our release according last RC vote.
We need
mentors to guide the community.
--
Best Regards!
--
sospartan
Weex is a framework for building Mobile cross-platform high
Thank you.
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> Hi sospartan
>
> Yea, I see, there are several issues. I will not act as an official
> mentor, but I subscribed the dev list, and we'll see what we can do.
>
> Regards Raphael
>
> Am .05.2017, 11:2
John,
Thanks for the review.
I don't understand the issue with "sub-directory". Is there any standard
directory structure for source release?
John D. Ament 于2017年5月17日 周三下午11:41写道:
> sospartan,
>
> Couple of things noticed:
>
> - Your email still points to your
ok, I'll update my release script to bring every source code under root
directory.
Thanks for this tip.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:03 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:57 PM sospartan wrote:
>
> > John,
> > Thanks for the review.
> > I don
;
> Am .05.2017, 17:40 Uhr, schrieb John D. Ament :
>
> sospartan,
>>
>> Couple of things noticed:
>>
>> - Your email still points to your non-ASF hosted website. Don't forget to
>> point to your ASF website.
>> - The source release still contains a sub
Anybody wanna have a look at this release?
I've fixed all problems block release in previous RCs.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Am .05.2017, 11:23 Uhr, schrieb sospartan :
>
> Hi IPMC,
>>
>> I'm calling a vot
John and Craig,
Take a look at this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEEX-36
As I said in previous mail, all problems are fixed. Hope it's help.
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:34 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> sospartan,
>
> One thing that may help other IPMC members is to
se vote on releasing this RC.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
someone notes a blocking issue. I
> don't see any blocking issues listed in the prior candidate, however you
> are struggling to get that third vote.
>
> Its also good form to send a [CANCEL] email for the prior vote so people
> don't get lost.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Ma
Is this release have enough +1 bindings now?
I count rapheal, craig and john ~~ that's 3 of them. I shall prepare some
fireworks for this.
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> I give my +1 (binding) too
>
>
> Am .05.2017, 12:02 Uhr, schrieb sospar
Thanks for the review. We are working on these issue now. And
another RC will make.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I hope sospartan or someone else will soon show
> up. I think we should go for an RC5. There are simply
is issue. What is 'incorrect boilerplate text'?
Raphael, please help me on this one.
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Raphael Bircher
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am .06.2017, 02:59 Uhr, schrieb Justin Mclean :
>
> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. I hope sospartan or s
in
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io/>
HI,
We'll cancel this vote and start a new RC later.
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
.apache.org%3E
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
ke your
> build instructions/script could use a refresh :)
> * L&N look ok at a glance. xsums/sigs are good.
>
> On 6/5/17 5:27 AM, sospartan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC5 release.
> > The changes fix problems
Hi IMPC,
With 3 +1 and no -1, the vote has passed.
Thanks to Raphael Bircher, John D. Ament and Josh Elser.
It's our very first release which is meaning a lot to us.
Thanks to people in previous vote thread too.
--
Best Regards!
sospartan
http://weex.apache.org/ <https://weex-project.io>
30 matches
Mail list logo