From: "Roy T. Fielding" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is, the PMC is supposed to be
elected by the committers on the project, or include all of the
committers
on the project, because that's pretty much the only way to ensure that
what we do remains a true collaboration and doesn't degrade into some
Conor MacNeill wrote:
This statement would seem to be in conflict with the PMC bylaws.
The PMC bylaws are broken in a number of areas.
Is the ASF board overriding the PMC bylaws just in this instance
or does this principle hold for all PMC appointments? If it is the
latter, then do the
Conor MacNeill wrote:
Is the ASF board overriding the PMC bylaws just in this instance or does
this principle hold for all PMC appointments? If it is the latter, then do
the bylaws need to be amended to that effect?
Sam Ruby wrote:
The PMC bylaws are broken in a number of areas.
... /
From: "Sam Ruby" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Roy is not overriding the PMC bylaws, he is simply describing the
original
intent of the board.
That being said, I agree with Roy.
Oh, I agree too. I am just wondering how all this fits together. For
example the recent vote by PMC members on PMC nominees.
Henri Gomez wrote:
Pierpaolo Fumagalli is IBMer ?
At the time he did accept paychecks from IBM. Now he accepts paychecks
from Sun. In between he accepted paychecks from a company named Exoffice
which changed its name to Intalio.
Who you accept paychecks from and who you are can be quite
Conor MacNeill wrote:
Oh, I agree too. I am just wondering how all this fits together.
For example the recent vote by PMC members on PMC nominees. Is
that superceded by this statement? What is the plan from here?
My bias is towards evolution, so we'll try that first. If not, there
always is
when is it again?
-jon
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is possible to write Apache modules with mod_jk (the original goal of
mod_java) ? Besides the main use of mod_jk is interacting with Tomcat, the
Ajpv13 protocol could be used to communicate with other programs, right ? If
so, some description/documentation of the protocol would be fine.
-
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Elias Bayeh, IBM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hans Bergstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Davidson, Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pierpaolo Fumagalli, IBM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig McClanahan, MyTownNet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who you accept paychecks from and who you are can be quite different
things. Pier is a perfect example.
Meaning that no-matter who "owned" me, I've always been the usual pain in
the ass :) :) :) :)
Pier
--
Ted,
Sounds good to me. I think it would be better to start with one mailing list
so ensure there is enough "mass" in discussions. Also, I am a bit dubious
about the name "commons" (Don't know if there has been much discussion about
that). The concept of a Commons is often used as an example of
Nice initiative.
Sharing code is allways great and there are in jakarta
projects some fine pieces of code which could be used outside
their 'original' project.
A suggestion will be to ask all of you to do your best to
organize this subproject in many smaller sub-subprojects just
to avoid
The archive for the interim "library-dev" mailing list is at
mail-archive.com
There is also a page linking the working documents at
http://husted.com/about/jakarta/library.html .
My own preference is that it be called something simple and generic. (I
was good with library.)
Conor MacNeill
on 3/6/01 2:03 PM, "Ted Husted" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal for "The Commons" - A Jakarta Subproject
version 1.0 - 5 Mar 2001
(0) rationale
Apache-Java and Jakarta originally hosted product-based subprojects,
consisting of one major deliverable. The Java language however is
14 matches
Mail list logo
