Robert wrote:
i sometimes find it hard to work out where opinion stops and policy
begins...
Then again... it is surely the PMC's business to know or find out, and
enforce?
I mean, IANAL but as a manager I would think that if the PMC is charged
with oversight it is surely marginally better for
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would
like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public
domain, just to make it as easy as possible for readers of the
article to reuse that code.
Is
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:33 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would
like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public
domain, just to make it as easy as
Simon Kitching wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 13:33 +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am now looking at writing an article about unit testing and would
like to be able to provide these classes as code in the public
domain, just to make
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site.
- robert
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 18:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Jul 26 11:08:22 2005
New
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site.
snip/
I also see a pending mod for Stefan's update of
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Jean-Frederic
docs/site/downloads/download_tomcat.html is generated and so these
changes are in grave danger of being reverted next time someone
regenerates the site.
Hi,
i posted something to stefan off list (wanted to email him anyway).
I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the etiquette
is.
for me, it's a judgement call depending on the person and the change.
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 16:52 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 7/26/05, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I just regenerated the site, but I avoided reverting those two. I could
easily have committed those; I just didn't know what the etiquette
is.
for me, it's a
Hi,
Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received??
Thanks,
Simon
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 16:50 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
Brian sent his CLA in by post about 12 days ago. How can I check whether
it has been received/processed?
Thanks,
Simon
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 22:50
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received??
Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's
was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it again, in case
it got lost somehow.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received??
Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's
was not amongst them. You might want to ask him to fax it
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 19:49 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
Any sign of Brian's CLA having been received??
Nope, not yet. Jim added in a bunch of received iCLAs on 7/14, and Brian's
was not amongst
13 matches
Mail list logo
