m zyzy wrote:
Could Tomcat 6 core binary be used in 64-bit Linux O/S ? which one of 64-bit
JDK 5 or 6 is recommended ? FYI the machine's processor is a 2 core Intel
with Intel 64 support, 16 GB DDR2 FB and 160BG SATA2 SAS.
And how many maximum heap -Xmx and PermGen space memory should be enough
Hi Henry,
unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this behaviour. :-(
I run mvn clean install in the source unpacked directory and everything
goes smooth.
Can you tell me what is the error in the test-logs?
Or maybe try to run it again?
Or even try the rc2, which is here:
Hi all,
maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the artifacts?
What is your opinion expressed by any of the three numbers :-).
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Petar Tahchiev
paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
here comes the second attempt for
releasing cactus-1.8.1.
On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the artifacts?
1 minor problem - the .asc files should be detached ascii signatures,
not signed archives.
No need to recreate the RC, just recreate the .asc files.
We
Clicked that the cause is my already having something on port 8080.
Hen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Petar Tahchiev
paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Henry,
unfortunately I am unable to reproduce this behaviour. :-(
I run mvn clean install in the source unpacked directory and
Hi Sebb,
I have uploaded the signatures as detached files.
Cheers, Petar.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:49 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the artifacts?
1 minor
On 20/01/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
maybe I am too impatient, but has anybody tried the artifacts?
1 minor problem - the .asc files should be detached ascii signatures,
not signed archives.
No need
Hi Sebb,
I removed the CDDL license and described the servlet-api as
an Apache 2.0 licensed. I also added the Apache license headers.
I also changed the version of AspectJ we are using.
About the test failures that you mention I think they are different
from what Henry is getting. Anyways I am
Hi guys,
I think I found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce
this behaviour I am clueless if this will work.
I think the problem is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-98
I changed the version of the Surefire plugin we use to the latest
one.
I have commited it. Anything else
On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I think I found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce
this behaviour I am clueless if this will work.
I think the problem is here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-98
The issue relates to not finding
Actually Hentry's problem
was that he had something alreadty running on port 8080.
But you are right. We check if the property is set :-(
Ok, I will try to investigate further.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:06 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev
Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I
get the same set of errors as Seb.
Hen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Petar Tahchiev
paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually Hentry's problem
was that he had something alreadty running on port 8080.
But you are right.
12 matches
Mail list logo
