Re: ASPizer

2001-10-17 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Endre, Although Jon might not be the most politically-correct person around, he is usually right. Jon is correct to observe that Jakarta is not a dumping ground for .bomb projects. I am very grateful to Jon for having the courage to speak up his mind. One might be crititical of Jon but he

Re: ASPizer

2001-10-17 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Endre, Of course it's not a dumping ground. This is about whether the Open Source Community at Apache would be interested in a project. Starting the debate from Apache's side with such crude, ugly, disrespectful remarks like Jon's coming up with is just not fair. This company is dumping a

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-01 Thread Ceki Gulcu
At 07:39 02.01.2002 +1100, Peter Donald wrote: Hi, This is not something that should have been brought up on the PMC list - it should be discussed on general. Peter I do not need your permission to bring up a subject on the PMC list. It was uncourteous of you to forward my message to the

Re: Just the JARs

2002-01-02 Thread Ceki Gulcu
At 18:56 01.01.2002 -0800, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 14:54:30 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Just the JARs

Re: Code conventions

2002-01-02 Thread Ceki Gulcu
At 19:23 02.01.2002 +1100, you wrote: On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:58, Ceki Gulcu wrote: At 07:39 02.01.2002 +1100, Peter Donald wrote: Hi, This is not something that should have been brought up on the PMC list - it should be discussed on general. Peter I do not need your permission to bring up

Re: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

2002-01-07 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Sam, You are right stop creating new projects does not solve the Validator problem. However, stopping the creation of new projects might have long term effects. The effect might be increased collaboration or alternatively everyone leaving. It is a dangerous/stupid/daring (pick your choice)

Re: Commons Validator Packaging/Content

2002-01-07 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Peter, So are you proposing to become a log4j committer? Regards, Ceki --- Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:15, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Of course it is easier to start from scratch to invent yet another validation framework. This is where I see another

Re: [PATCH] jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail.xml

2002-01-09 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Done. I hope the actual patch contains less typos than my previous mail describing the patch. :-) --- Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 1/9/02 4:27 AM, Ceki Gulcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Here is a patch jakarta-site2/xdocs/site/mail.xml, the source

Possiblly an attack, certainly a nuissance

2002-01-28 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hi, Could we please disable posts from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to jakarta/apache lists. This person (or an impostor) has posted emails with the title new photos from my party! to many jakarta lists. The content of this mail is possibly a virus. TIA, Ceki

RE: [VOTE] ASL vs. GPL page: is this okay?

2002-03-07 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Hi Alex, You are absolutely right. I thought I had this one nailed but apparently not. Thank you for pointing out my mistake. Regards, Ceki Asunto: Re: [VOTE] ASL vs. GPL page: is this okay? The Working Without Copyleft article is remarkably good. The point about the FSF controlling the LGPL

RE: [VOTE] ASL vs. GPL page: is this okay?

2002-03-07 Thread Ceki Gulcu
Ceki are you sure? I think we definitely need a solid document countering the idyllic but false world depicted by the FSF. I agree with comments you have made already, about the importance of licence and legal to ASF, Jakarta, and individuals involved, but I'm still not convinced that