Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Michael A. Smith
For information on proposing new Jakarta subprojects, please read: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html regards, michael On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Nathaniel G. Auvil wrote: My name is Nathaniel Auvil and I run the jCharts project hosted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcharts/ I

Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Matt Egyhazy
fyi, i have noticed that jakarta will only take projects if they already have an active community to avoid dead projects floating around. matt - Original Message - From: Nathaniel G. Auvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:41 AM Subject: adding my

Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi Nathaniel, thank you for your offer, please read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html. On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Nathaniel G. Auvil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been carrying all the weight of this project since its inception have trouble finding people who want to contribute to

Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Peter Donald
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 02:41, Nathaniel G. Auvil wrote: My name is Nathaniel Auvil and I run the jCharts project hosted at http://sourceforge.net/projects/jcharts/ I was wondering if there would be any possibility of jCharts joining the Jakarta project. I have been carrying all the weight of

Re: Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread acoliver
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:13:50 1100 Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote. No offense to commons but if one can make ones project move up the list on sourceforge, I would venture to guess they'd get far more exposure then as a new package under commons. There is a hump to travel up on

Re: Re: adding my project to jakarta

2002-02-25 Thread Nathaniel G. Auvil
thanks everyone for all the info. i see i have a lot of work to do. ;) if anyone would like help out or give more advice, please do so. --- acoliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 07:13:50 1100 Peter Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote. No offense to commons but if one can