Henri Yandell wrote:
snip/
It would be great if we could get a consensus on what an umbrella
is and
An umbrella is a joining of disjoint communities under a common TLP.
A non-umbrella is one in which the whole project is a part of the
same community.
Nice definition. Thanks.
snip/
Hi Phil,
On 12/28/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks again. So the real problem is disjointness. It seems then that
we have three logical alternatives:
I don't think there is a lot of difference any of these. Jakarta
commons as a TLP is basically (1) as well. There are
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Phil Steitz wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
The biggest problem with Jakarta currently is that we've become
increasingly disjoint. In many ways we are less healthy than we were 4
years ago. We have less projects, but much less in the way of intersection
between
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Brett Porter wrote:
Thinking more about this, I don't know about pushing things into
commons. The important thing is consistent practices, consolidated
committers and community, but maybe not the naming. Jakarta BCEL
sounds fine to stay that way, as does Jakarta Commons
