Beso wrote:
2008/5/29 Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
Do I NEED kde-meta-4.0 installed? The HOWTO says otherwise. I'd prefer
to have a chance to fall back on to 3.5.9 if I need to.
you can have kde-meta-4.0.4 and kde3.5.9 installed
2008/5/30 Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/5/30 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso wrote:
2008/5/29 Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
Do I NEED kde-meta-4.0 installed? The HOWTO says otherwise. I'd
prefer
to have a chance to fall
2008/5/30 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso wrote:
2008/5/30 Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/5/30 Mark Haney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso wrote:
2008/5/29 Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
On Donnerstag, 29. Mai 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
Do I NEED kde-meta-4.0 installed? The
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 13:19:08 +:
you unistall it and install the new slot. the kde 4.1 should have the
kde4 slot while the kde4.1 beta has the kde4-live slot. you can clearly
see that they're different slots and that
2008/5/30 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Beso [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Fri, 30 May 2008 13:19:08 +:
you unistall it and install the new slot. the kde 4.1 should have the
kde4 slot while the kde4.1 beta has the kde4-live slot. you can clearly
see
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't go back.
At least not easily.
With pkgcore you can switch between pkgcore and portage
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to use paludis:
you can't go back.
At least not
David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not to
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:48:03 Barry Schwartz wrote:
I suggest that Paludis delete that from the FAQ if the people
responsible don't want a reputation as bullies, because this is
bullying.
No it isn't.
There is also the example above of someone being accused of lying
simply for stating a
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also think that
* it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. Even
tho I'm running only a single computer
there is another reason not
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:18:18 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html
for some numbers.
Lies, damned lies, and what was that other thing?
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
oh really?
I don't think so.
You also think that
* it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
chose
On Friday 30 May 2008 23:17:55 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And in my opinion, you are just an obsessive, delusional, anti-Paludis
fundamentalist. Whenever it (or Exherbo) is mentioned, you're right there,
spewing your retarded lies and
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.ht
ml
ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
rbrownspb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour.
On Saturday 31 May 2008 00:41:25 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
You must have missed the forced retirement of spb and rbrown exactly
because of their behaviour. Do I need to find the bugzilla link for you?
There's nothing on any of those bugs that would come even close to justifying
retirement,
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] skribis:
On Samstag, 31. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.ht
ml
ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
paludis.
Guys - let's try to keep this civil!
There are lots of folks who use and like paludis who aren't trolls. I'm
among them.
woops, my bad, I didn't mean to send that to the list.
(Much embarassment)
--
gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Richard Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
paludis.
Guys - let's try to keep this civil!
There are
21 matches
Mail list logo
