[gentoo-amd64] Re: Mono emerge problem

2009-06-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/12/2009 09:40 AM, Keith Jackson wrote: I am getting the following error. I don't want X on my system, it's a server box, but i do want mono. Perhaps I'm dumb, but from this error message I can't figure out how to tell it that yes, I want mono, and no, I don't want X, and yes, I want to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Mono emerge problem

2009-06-12 Thread Alex Alexander
dev-dotnet/libgdiplus depends on cairo[X] to avoid it you can use the minimal USE flag on dev-lang/mono that removes the dependency on libgdiplus. echo dev-lang/mono minimal /etc/portage/package.use -- Alex Alexander || wired Gentoo QT KDE Herd Tester http://www.linuxized.com On Fri, Jun

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Alex Alexander
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:07, Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: please explain me why this option is bad? I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of kde installed (well, you could in the past, until someone started to put crap into

[gentoo-amd64] Amarok update failure

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Stear
Hello all, I have the following error when updating amarok to version amarok-1.4.10_p20090130-r2 Making all in konquisidebar grep: /usr/lib64/libpcreposix.la: No such file or directory /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib64/libpcreposix.la: No such file or directory libtool: link:

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Sebastian Redl
Alex Alexander wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:07, Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: please explain me why this option is bad? I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of kde installed (well, you could in the past, until someone

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amarok update failure

2009-06-12 Thread Beso
2009/6/12 Paul Stear gen...@appjaws.plus.com Hello all, I have the following error when updating amarok to version amarok-1.4.10_p20090130-r2 Making all in konquisidebar grep: /usr/lib64/libpcreposix.la: No such file or directory /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib64/libpcreposix.la: No such

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amarok update failure

2009-06-12 Thread Paul Stear
On Friday 12 June 2009 10:51:41 Beso wrote: 2009/6/12 Paul Stear gen...@appjaws.plus.com Hello all, I have the following error when updating amarok to version amarok-1.4.10_p20090130-r2 snip Where do I get libpcreposix.la from? I am running KDE 3.5.10 it should belong to libpcre

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:07, Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: please explain me why this option is bad? I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of kde installed (well, you could in the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Mark Haney
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:07, Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: please explain me why this option is bad? I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of kde

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Alex Alexander
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 14:16, Volker Armin Hemmannvolkerar...@googlemail.com wrote: On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: Do I need to remind you that kde's own documentation once said that you should install into /opt? into its own directory? Maybe that changed, but the 'not

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Alex Alexander
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 15:13, Mark Haneymha...@ercbroadband.org wrote: Wow, I didn't realize I was opening up such a hornet's nest.  I don't /need/ kdeprefix as such.  But, the fact is I used it because there were (and still are AFAIK) apps that require the KDE3.5 libs (k3b in particular) and

Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Alex Alexander wrote: they still help if the update breaks your system =] they don't help too much with kde-live (because of that I copy the packages from /usr/packges into a backup dir before the update starts.) you should keep ~/.kde4 backups manually anyway :)

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amarok update failure

2009-06-12 Thread Richard Freeman
Paul Stear wrote: I should have thought of that, I am now updating 33 packages so hopefully amarok will install correctly after they have finished. Paul I'm attempting the lafilefixer solution listed in the libpcre install notes. However, I'm beginning to think I'd have been better off

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Amarok update failure

2009-06-12 Thread Beso
2009/6/12 Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org Paul Stear wrote: I should have thought of that, I am now updating 33 packages so hopefully amarok will install correctly after they have finished. Paul I'm attempting the lafilefixer solution listed in the libpcre install notes. However, I'm

[gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Duncan
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de posted h0sosu$bc...@ger.gmane.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:25:51 +0300: On 06/11/2009 11:07 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of kde installed *If* you want multiple

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Beso
2009/6/12 Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de posted h0sosu$bc...@ger.gmane.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:25:51 +0300: On 06/11/2009 11:07 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: I can give you examples why it is good: -you can have multiple versions of

[gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/12/2009 07:58 PM, Beso wrote: finally, 4.3 will mark the removal of my old 3.5 installation. i think that for about 90% of people will be finally able to switch entirely to kde4. The apps are now mostly complete and the 3.5 apps that are still maintained have now been ported; plasma is ok

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 07:58 PM, Beso wrote: finally, 4.3 will mark the removal of my old 3.5 installation. i think that for about 90% of people will be finally able to switch entirely to kde4. The apps are now mostly complete and the 3.5 apps that

[gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/12/2009 08:43 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 07:58 PM, Beso wrote: finally, 4.3 will mark the removal of my old 3.5 installation. i think that for about 90% of people will be finally able to switch entirely to kde4. The

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 08:43 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 07:58 PM, Beso wrote: finally, 4.3 will mark the removal of my old 3.5 installation. i think that for about 90% of people

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 09:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: [...] nothing with none exception. I had to set up dmix a long time ago, then it worked automagically.. but blocking apps? nope. Without dmix everything blocks. After I've set it up, I

[gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE and kdeprefix

2009-06-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/12/2009 10:52 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Freitag 12 Juni 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/12/2009 09:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: [...] nothing with none exception. I had to set up dmix a long time ago, then it worked automagically.. but blocking apps? nope. Without

[gentoo-amd64] texlive collision

2009-06-12 Thread Keith Jackson
* Messages for package dev-texlive/texlive-latex-2008-r1: * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to other * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq * owners / filename` to identify the installed package that owns a * file. If portageq reports