Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager OT

2005-05-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 04:51:36PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | If a dev doesn't have adequate knowledge for a particular package he | shouldn't be fscking with it in the first place. So there said package | can sit, having only the ability to install to / just like it always | has until

[gentoo-dev] distfiles whitelisting

2005-05-08 Thread Brian Harring
Just a friendly reminder, if you are placing files on the distfiles mirrors that are not claimed by an ebuild in the tree, you need to whitelist the files- just add the files to /space/distfiles-whitelist-current on dev.gentoo.org , and the files will be left alone for 6 months, or until

Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager

2005-05-08 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 12:47:05AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: 6 Portage must disallow the creation of binary packages where all dependencies are not in the same PREFIX. First level, second level... ? I'd rather see the deps/prefix data slapped into the binpkg, and tracked alongside, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-08 Thread Aaron Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ian Brandt wrote: # svnadmin verify /var/svn/repos/ *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (out): 0x08064768 *** Aborted Are you sure you have the latest versions of everything? When the big apache unmask happened, my subversion broke

Re: [gentoo-dev] ATTN: fonts herd maintainers

2005-05-08 Thread Aaron Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Donnie Berkholz wrote: You are incorrectly reading it. This is why the maintainingproject tag exists, so we don't need to duplicate the same information in 500 places. Yeah tove informed me of this on irc. Actually, herdstat was incorrectly

[gentoo-dev] New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Alin Nastac
Hi folks, I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing the following packages: net-dialup/gammu net-dialup/gnokii net-dialup/wammu net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager Yes, I know. It is a short list, but shouldn't be a category representative for its content? Alin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Lars Weiler
* Alin Nastac [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/05/08 16:17 +0300]: I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing the following packages: Add app-misc/scmxx app-misc/gscmxx app-misc/vmoconv to the list. They are all for Siemens phones. sys-fs/siefs may be another candidate, but it

Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuilds for windows apps under wine?

2005-05-08 Thread David Gümbel
On Samstag 07 Mai 2005 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any plans for supporting ebuilds for windows apps which use wine? I just installed wine (via the ebuild) to enable DVDShrink to be installed. Worked like a charm, but it would have been much cooler to 'emerge dvdshrink' and have

[gentoo-dev] Last chance to save media-plugins/bmp-outlame

2005-05-08 Thread Tony Vroon
bmp-outlame causes instability with large playlists, and may seriously impair BMP's ability to play MP3 files. It has been masked since March 12. Should you want to save it, a patch is expected that makes it behave correctly. If you're a dev, I expect you to maintain this package afterwards. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager OT

2005-05-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 8 May 2005 02:58:32 -0500 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Write the sucker up as a glep, issues and all for discussion, and you | attack those involved as trying to bypass the discussion. Bah. It should have been written up as a GLEP with the initial feedback already

Re: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode utf8)

2005-05-08 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2005 14:21:58 -0400 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | as many know, i dont use unicode, so i'm a bit ignorant of it ... | | is there a good reason for having both a global 'unicode' USE flag and | a bunch of local 'utf8' USE flags ? or should i file

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I don't use kasteroids so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue. Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 08 May 2005 18:16, LostSon wrote: Im curious as to why KDE is still masked by ~x86 usually KDE moves into

Re: [gentoo-dev] Subversion and Apache 2.0.54

2005-05-08 Thread Ian Brandt
I realized I had added: =dev-libs/apr-0.9.6 =dev-libs/apr-util-0.9.6 to /etc/portage/package.keywords, and that is why apr-1.1.1 and apr-1.1.2 were installed, and not because they were required by apache-2.0.54. I changed = to ~ on those entries, unmerged them, re-emerged apache-2.0.54 and

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 08 May 2005 19:05, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: Hmm ... I'm still at gcc 3.3.5 but I'm running KDE 3.4 -- am I immune? I don't use kasteroids so I wouldn't have run into the obvious issue. With gcc 3.3 you should be safe (as long as -fvisibility=hidden patch wasn't ported to it). --

[gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread R Hill
Alin Nastac wrote: Hi folks, I think we should make a new category called app-cellphone containing the following packages: net-dialup/gammu net-dialup/gnokii net-dialup/wammu net-wireless/gnome-phone-manager Yes, I know. It is a short list, but shouldn't be a category representative for

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread Luke-Jr
On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote: The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff. Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as it's not a bug in

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread Matthijs van der Vleuten
On 5/8/05, Luke-Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 08 May 2005 16:30, Jason Stubbs wrote: The only issue I heard about was problems with gcc3.4's -fvisibility stuff. Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote: Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as it's not a bug in KDE... Wrong, it's a KDE bug. To be exact is KDE bug #101542. The problem is

[gentoo-dev] Project Gentopia (everything Utopia based)

2005-05-08 Thread Doug Goldstein
Hello Gentoo users devs, This is just to let everyone know there's going to be a group of devs that will handle all your Project Utopia needs. Project Utopia is the freedesktop.org push towards HAL DBus basically. This will hopefully help foser out who maintains everything under the sun. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Alin Nastac
R Hill wrote: this doesn't include anything like VOIP of course. btw i think cellphone is an Americanism. i worked for ATT Wireless before they were bought by Cingular and the term cellphone was discouraged for that reason. maybe just app-phone? hmm... I think it should include cell or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread W.Kenworthy
In Oz, cellphone is only used in american movies, here they are called mobile phones (formal), mobiles (common usage) and mob when written (e.g., Mob: 0419...) There's also the upcoming cell processor architecture that may clash in the future. How about app-mobphone or app-mobilephone or perhaps

[gentoo-dev] Will Gentoo be at Linux World Expo San Fran?

2005-05-08 Thread James Dio
Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of this month? -- James Dio www.psunit.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] #Normal EMAIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] #Mailing list signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Re: Will Gentoo be at Linux World Expo San Fran?

2005-05-08 Thread James Dio
CORRECTION: quite tired really... I meant during AUGUST not the end of this month.. sorry On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:06 -0400, James Dio wrote: Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of this month? -- James Dio www.psunit.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] #Normal EMAIL [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Will Gentoo be at Linux World Expo San Fran?

2005-05-08 Thread Lance Albertson
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:11 -0400, James Dio wrote: CORRECTION: quite tired really... I meant during AUGUST not the end of this month.. sorry Yes, we're planning on it! On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:06 -0400, James Dio wrote: Will Gentoo be at Linux World expo in San Fransisco the end of

Re: [gentoo-dev] duplicated USE flag (unicode utf8)

2005-05-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 May 2005 11:33 am, Francesco Riosa wrote: mysql-4.1 should use utf8 what does that have to do with this thread ? file a bug (if one hasnt already been filed) and dont use the 'utf8' flag, use the 'unicode' flag -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Lars Weiler
* Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/05/08 17:01 -0600]: You could always borrow from the Germans and call it app-handy. Yeah! That's pure Denglisch :) And while we are on it, add all packages for presentations into an app-beamer group ;-) Well, back on topic. Some of the suggested

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 May 2005 04:46 pm, Alin Nastac wrote: R Hill wrote: this doesn't include anything like VOIP of course. btw i think cellphone is an Americanism. i worked for ATT Wireless before they were bought by Cingular and the term cellphone was discouraged for that reason. maybe just

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE 3.4 still ~x86

2005-05-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 08 May 2005 04:30 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: On Sunday 08 May 2005 22:24, Luke-Jr wrote: Strange that a Gentoo bug (vanilla GCC 3.4 doesn't have visibility; Gentoo adds it via a broken patch) prevents KDE from being marked stable, seeing as it's not a bug in KDE...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category proposal

2005-05-08 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 09/05/2005-01:50:04(+0200): Lars Weiler types * Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/05/08 17:01 -0600]: You could always borrow from the Germans and call it app-handy. Yeah! That's pure Denglisch :) And while we are on it, add all packages for presentations into an app-beamer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] eclectic-0.9.1

2005-05-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 07 May 2005 22:37:22 +0200 Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Work on further modules is in progress like: I just wrote an etc-update workalike as an eclectic module. Mostly as an experiment to see how we're going to handle interactive stuff... Sample session at:

[gentoo-dev] ignore me

2005-05-08 Thread Ned Ludd
ignore me.. do not respond. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] new glep draft: Portage as a secondary package manager

2005-05-08 Thread Marius Mauch
Brian Harring wrote: Clarify please :) Offhand, I don't see why a bin repo for a home target isn't viable, along with a vdb repo in the same location. It's a bit trickier, but I suspect it might be a bit more flexible in the long run. I don't think that's possible without a lot of hacking for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] eclectic-0.9.1

2005-05-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 09 May 2005 04:00:08 +0300 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | * What do the maintainers of Gentoo's various -config and -update | scripts think about converting their scripts into eclectic | modules ? | | Neither etc-update nor env-update fall into this domain. Heh,