Marcin Kryczek wrote:
hi,
currently i'm the only active developer in net-p2p herd, which is really
uncomfortable for me (not mentioning about situation if i'll be away for
few weeks). i need at least 2 developers (preferably with java knowledge,
becouse i do not know java at all, but it's not
On Monday 10 of October 2005 23:36 Marcin Kryczek wrote:
council could decide if it's worth to try and put some herd (GDP?) to be
responsible for it.
Uh, and what *exactly* do you mean by be responsible for it? I mean, are we
supposed to watch every possible communication channel or would the
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:36:36 +0200 Marcin Kryczek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| someone (sorry - but i can't remind who exactly and i can't find that
| mail) mentiond it'd be nice to have some ~weekly summary of important
| (for developers) decisions made in community.
11.10.2005, 10:39:56, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Monday 10 of October 2005 23:36 Marcin Kryczek wrote:
council could decide if it's worth to try and put some herd (GDP?) to be
responsible for it.
Uh, and what *exactly* do you mean by be responsible for it? I mean, are we
supposed to watch every
On Tuesday 11 of October 2005 10:47 Jakub Moc wrote:
Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or whatever it
would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due to the constant
flames...
Nothing, of course. But how would you prevent flames from happening on a new
11.10.2005, 10:52:35, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Tuesday 11 of October 2005 10:47 Jakub Moc wrote:
Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or whatever it
would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due to the constant
flames...
Nothing, of course. But how would you
On Tuesday 11 of October 2005 10:55 Jakub Moc wrote:
Hint: read-only ml? :=)
And who will submit the news?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
pgpiIonAFZ408.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jakub Moc wrote:
11.10.2005, 10:52:35, Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Tuesday 11 of October 2005 10:47 Jakub Moc wrote:
Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or whatever it
would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due to the constant
flames...
Nothing, of
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:08 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or
| whatever it would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due
| to the constant flames...
The problem is that no-one has put together a proper
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 12:32 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:47:08 +0200 Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Bleh, what's wrong w/ the idea to create gentoo-dev-annouce or
| whatever it would be called? Many people gave up on reading -core due
| to the constant flames...
This is probably the fifth time at least that I've been bitten by this...
Portage is great in that it manages compiles for a bulk of applications
(including dependencies) in one fell swoop.
Yesterday I emerged gnome - that was it, just gnome, and it took care of the
whole thing soup to nuts.
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 14:18, Dave Nebinger wrote:
So here's the enhancement: have portage collect all of these kinds of
messages and display them after all of the emerging has completed.
See bug 11359 - this is an old enhancement request... I would also like to see
something implemented
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:08:30AM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I added myself to net-p2p to look after some java packages if I have the
time [...]
nice to hear that. any help appreciated;]
--
. . Marcin Kryczek . . . . . . . . . . . .RLU: #316599 . .
. . Gentoo Linux
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:18 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
This is probably the fifth time at least that I've been bitten by this...
Portage is great in that it manages compiles for a bulk of applications
(including dependencies) in one fell swoop.
Yesterday I emerged gnome - that was it,
Well, there's enotice.http://dev.gentoo.org/~eldad/On 10/11/05, Carlos Silva
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:18 -0400, Dave Nebinger wrote:
This is probably the fifth time at least that I've been bitten by this... Portage is great in that it manages compiles for a bulk of
On 11/10/2005 9:18:41, Dave Nebinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is probably the fifth time at least that I've been bitten by this...
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11359
[NEW FEATURE] pkg_postinst/pkg_preinst ewarn/einfo logging
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
FYI elog is implemented in CVS ( 2.1 ). When it will be released is
anyone's guess.
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On 11/10/2005 9:18:41, Dave Nebinger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is probably the fifth time at least that I've been bitten by this...
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:00:57AM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I'd like to see the council fight it out over^W^W^W^Wdiscuss which
logger should be the default.
*lol*
That gave me a good laugh. Oh well, anyway. What's default? As in
recommended by the documentation? Or installed as
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:00:56 +
Alec Joseph Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI elog is implemented in CVS ( 2.1 ). When it will be released is
anyone's guess.
2.1? probably never, but elog will almost certainly be backported to
the 2.0 branch.
Marius
--
Public Key at
Simon Strandman wrote:
I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
nessecary?
I tried removing it and had no problems building glibc and I could see
that it was used when looking at the compile
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Strandman wrote:
| I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
| added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
| nessecary?
I think it had something to do with breaking binutils 2.15.90 or
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 07:56 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Simon Strandman wrote:
| I'm curious why --as-needed is disabled for glibc builds. It was first
| added over a year ago in one of the early 2.3.4 builds so is it still
| nessecary?
I think it had something to do with breaking
Anders Bruun Olsen wrote:
But aren't eggs a bit against the Gentoo philosophy? I mean there are
some eggs that contain precompiled C-extensions. Shouldn't it still be
source builds that just somehow work with setuptools?
We wouldn't use the precompiled C eggs. The main reason I'm looking
at
Since axxo is being a slacker (:-P) and hasn't posted this, did a
quicky implentation for stable ebuild.sh of pre/post phase hooks.
The intention of these hooks are for users to define funcs in their
/etc/portage/bashrc; the phase to be hooked, say pkg_setup , is hooked
via
echo $'
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:37:43AM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:52:24PM -0500, Mikey wrote:
http://codeserver.wherever.net/pman/package_ids.php?action=packageid=10105
[snip bits about wget screwing up]
Others have already clarified that's
Brian Harring wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:37:43AM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:52:24PM -0500, Mikey wrote:
http://codeserver.wherever.net/pman/package_ids.php?action=packageid=10105
[snip bits about wget screwing up]
Others have
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
Matthias Waechter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
Where do you get the filename from if not SRC_URI?
Additional metadata tagged in, or mangling of the syntax in some
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Sorry, but here the results are not those expected:
.51.22 vs .53_rc5... try with a vanilla .53_rc5 please
time emerge --metadata; 1st run; 2.0.51.22-r3
real2m24.419s
user0m12.329s
sys 0m3.644s
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:49:44AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Brian Harring ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Sorry, but here the results are not those expected:
.51.22 vs .53_rc5... try with a vanilla .53_rc5 please
here
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 03:49:44AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Brian Harring ha scritto:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 12:01:12AM +0200, Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
Sorry, but here the results are not those expected:
.51.22 vs .53_rc5... try with a vanilla .53_rc5 please
here
Rather then keep posting large patches here, just going to post them
to dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0 ... for example,
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/2.0/3.0-cache-backport-experimental-4.patch
should be pulled rather then previous patch.
Helluva lot easier for me since I can
31 matches
Mail list logo
