* Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-05 18:40]:
[...]
How do people feel about adding this to the configuration of toucan?
Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ and http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ URLs?
I like it.
--
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 00:48 -0500, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
To all,
This is just an 7-8 hour warning for the coming downtime of
bugs.gentoo.org for upgrade. I plan to upgrade bugzilla the morning
(EDT) of December 7th. I plan on alotting 30 minutes for the upgrade,
although those in the past
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
| On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 00:48 -0500, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
|This is just an 7-8 hour warning for the coming downtime of
|bugs.gentoo.org for upgrade. I plan to upgrade bugzilla the morning
|(EDT) of December 7th. I plan on
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 21:37, Alec Warner wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
To all,
Just to give you an update. The planned upgrade of bugzilla from 2.18 to
2.20 on bugs.gentoo.org did not go as planned. A good amount of the
internal database structure behind bugzilla changed from the jump in
stable versions and while running the update script, it crapped out.
Yes, real
Hi,
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;)
Marius
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let
Does this X version come with a new ATI RADEON driver ?? Do you know if DRI
can be used with Composite extension in ATI cards ??
Thanks,
Rafael Fernández López.
El Lunes, 5 de Diciembre de 2005 20:36, Donnie Berkholz escribió:
Hi everyone,
With 7.0rc3 that's been entering the tree last
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ and http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ URLs?
*cough*
http://www.gentoo.org/~brix
No clue if that's a hold over from older days,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:34:32PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ and http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ URLs?
*cough*
Marius Mauch wrote:
Hi,
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
This will NOT be voted upon the next council meeting on thursday ;)
Marius
Really great that this has reached us, digest-* files are really
annoying from my pov.
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 18:39 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the more the merrier !
http://vapier.people.gentoo.org/ - http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
http://people.gentoo.org/~vapier/ - http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
http://www.gentoo.org/~vapier/ - http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/
-mike
but
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
How do people feel about adding this to the configuration of toucan?
Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ and http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ URLs?
A big thank you
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 18:39 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 12:34:32PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 06:39:45PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Allowing toucan:~brix/public_html/ to be accessed under either of the
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/
On Tuesday 06 of December 2005 19:54 Michael Cummings wrote:
[...]
but then no one would be able to go to my space because it would get
flagged as porn :/
If you knew Czech, you would know how could mine surname be interpreted ;-)
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:12:04 +
Luis Medinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be great if we can get a full rewrite instead of a
redirect.
On the other hand, having redirects is much better for googling
devs' pages. Queries like site:dev.gentoo.org cross compile will
continue to work just
You know, I'd actually support a rather more abrupt transition,
where we announce that on a particular date all digest files are going
to be removed, thereby breaking any version of portage older than
portage-x.y.z. Many people would probably miss such a deadline, but
assuming that we also
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 08:06:37PM +0100 or thereabouts, Henrik Brix Andersen
wrote:
A big thank you to whoever implemented this -
http://people.gentoo.org/brix/ now points to
http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/ :)
You're welcome.
However, it would be nice if it wasn't just a 302 redirect so
Jan Kundrát wrote:
On Tuesday 06 of December 2005 19:54 Michael Cummings wrote:
[...]
but then no one would be able to go to my space because it would get
flagged as porn :/
If you knew Czech, you would know how could mine surname be interpreted ;-)
Cheers,
-jkt
I know Czech but
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
| http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_URI?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain)
Mail
On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be
signed like the current ones? Would it be possible to have per-line
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:58:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:04:53 +0100 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
| http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
Any reason for SRCURI over SRC_URI?
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 06:39:10PM -0500, Olivier Crete wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest files be
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:39:10 -0500
Olivier Crete [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-12 at 17:04 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
I see nothing about GPG in the GLEP.. Would those manifest
Rafael Fernández López wrote:
Does this X version come with a new ATI RADEON driver ?? Do you know if DRI
can be used with Composite extension in ATI cards ??
Thanks,
Rafael Fernández López.
A little off-topic, but yes, the 'ati' driver contains the new
(experimental?) r300 code and EXA
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 01:39:03PM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote: [Tue Dec 06 2005, 10:04:53AM CST]
As promised here the GLEP for Manifest2 support:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0044.html
You know, I'd actually support a rather more abrupt transition,
where we
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:29, Zac Medico wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
That
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is.
That would be 2.0.54
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 11:17, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods
necessary to fix the
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm going to make a decision and offer until Friday (Saturday in
my time) for opposers to solidify and state any opposition. If
there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 01:01, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as 2.1_beta20051210.
Well, I've already stated several times that IMO using a 2.1
Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 01:01, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:38 +0900
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there's no solid opposition, Saturday I will put current trunk into
~arch as 2.1_beta20051210.
Well, I've already stated several times
31 matches
Mail list logo
