Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer's guides?

2005-12-18 Thread pclouds
On 11/30/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 28 November 2005 21:01, Curtis Napier wrote: A seperate tag like doc, as someone mentioned earlier, would also be a huge help but would still give you the homepage info as well. Seems like we are all ok for the doc

Re: [gentoo-dev] glep 42 (news) round six

2005-12-18 Thread Philip Webb
051218 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: * Change to -mm-dd for GLEP 45 compatibility. Good to see Gentoo adopting correct international date format. You are encouraged to reply to this thread saying I agree with ciaranm that repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces. No problem at

Re: [gentoo-dev] glep 42 (news) round six

2005-12-18 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 09:57 -0500, Philip Webb wrote: You are encouraged to reply to this thread saying I agree with ciaranm that repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces. No problem at all there (smile): spaces in names are A Bad Thing for Unix, as they conflict with the

Re: [gentoo-dev] glep 42 (news) round six

2005-12-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:18:16 +0200 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Another new issue nobody has mentioned yet: | The GLEP doesn't say anything about file permissions/ownership as in | who will/should be able to a) read news and b) modify the news-* | files. Without thinking too much about

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for kde-base/kmobile

2005-12-18 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
I've masked kde-base/kmobile pending removal, for a series of reasons: - it's not built by default - it's not useful, because it's incomplete - it's even broken on 3.5 and required patching to build, so the 3.5.0 never appeared - it's still unstable creating updown problems to people having it

Re: [gentoo-dev] glep 42 (news) round six

2005-12-18 Thread Brian Harring
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 04:52:23PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:27:32 -0800 Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | To head off the don't make features that are easily screwed up, | this isn't one of them- this is expecting code to behave correctly | from the path

Re: [gentoo-dev] problems crosscompiling libXt

2005-12-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 17 December 2005 18:20, David Thomas wrote: Here is a fix for libXt, similar to the problems I had with libX11 last week. I don't see an obvious way to patch the Makefile.am. Please send comments. you should startup a bug for this if one hasnt been already -mike --

[gentoo-portage-dev] dep_opconvert in portage.py and portage_dep

2005-12-18 Thread Brian Harring
Yo. New one from the looks of it- someone who has time (say, person who commited it), please iron out the portage.dep_opconvert and portage_dep.dep_opconvert. Naming sucks at the very least, but they look to be a candidate for refactoring/elimination. ~harring pgp22lOw8dnts.pgp Description: