Re: [gentoo-dev] Parallizing ebuilds - 'trivial' ebuilds

2006-01-12 Thread Philippe Trottier
Lisa Seelye wrote: On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 00:18 +, Ferris McCormick wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Lisa Seelye wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:51 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I've been cleaning up media-fonts/ to work with modular-X, and I

[gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info

2006-01-12 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, As stated in bug #74396, all ebuilds using kernel-mod.eclass must be converted to using either linux-mod.eclass and/or linux-info.eclass. The bug has been open since 2004-12-14, yet there are still ebuilds in the tree which inherits kernel-mod.eclass: $ find . -name *.ebuild|xargs grep

[gentoo-dev] Jan/2006 council agenda

2006-01-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
for this month: * GLEP 45 - GLEP date format * disallow multiple votes per person (from ciaranm) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11346783302r=1w=2 * global gentoo goals for 2006 for next month: * periodically freezing the tree for new packages (from carlo) i miss anything ? -mike --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC --- Thoughts on devrel bug content

2006-01-12 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 14:08 -0700, Duncan wrote: Ferris McCormick posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:04:19 +: B. Jurisdiction --- why this is something for devrel to consider (policy violation or whatever). This is a categorization of the report, not

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC --- Thoughts on devrel bug content

2006-01-12 Thread Duncan
Ferris McCormick posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:59:43 +: This list is not necessarily complete, nor is everything on the list necessarily appropriate for reporting to devrel. But it should give some idea of the sorts of things that are helpful for

[gentoo-dev] Re: Parallizing ebuilds - 'trivial' ebuilds

2006-01-12 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:11:27 -0500: app-arch/pbzip2 It covers only bzip2, but proves that it can be done. I tend to like it for catalyst, since it helps a lot on SMP machines. Very cool! I didn't know that existed. It could be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Parallizing ebuilds - 'trivial' ebuilds

2006-01-12 Thread Simon Stelling
Duncan wrote: app-arch/pbzip2 It covers only bzip2, but proves that it can be done. I tend to like it for catalyst, since it helps a lot on SMP machines. Very cool! I didn't know that existed. It could be quite useful here on my dual Opteron. Thanks! For those who wondered what might

Re: [gentoo-dev] a plea for testing help

2006-01-12 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 01:41:41PM +0100, Jan Kundr?t wrote: Greg KH wrote: And if someone wants to forward this over to -user, feel free. Do you want to have this kernel documented in our Kernel guide [1]? [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml#doc_chap3 That would be great

Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info

2006-01-12 Thread Doug Goldstein
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Hi, As stated in bug #74396, all ebuilds using kernel-mod.eclass must be converted to using either linux-mod.eclass and/or linux-info.eclass. The bug has been open since 2004-12-14, yet there are still ebuilds in the tree which inherits kernel-mod.eclass: $

Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup. We're still using cryptsetup on the InstallCD/LiveCD. Should we switch? What's the differences? -- Chris

Re: [gentoo-dev] Conversion from kernel-mod.eclass to linux-mod/linux-info

2006-01-12 Thread Benjamin Smee (strerror)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 lo, On Thursday 12 January 2006 17:17, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 11:45 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: AFAIK, cryptsetup should be pulled in favor of cryptsetup-luks. I think everything uses luks now rather then cryptsetup.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 05 January 2006 13:42, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 07:56:30AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: You guys are more than welcome to go apply at Red Hat or Novell. Some of us already work for companies that produce other Linux distributions or support the companies that do.

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages without homepages

2006-01-12 Thread Mark Loeser
Matthias Langer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: After reading the response for bug 118607, which i filed, i was woundering if there isn't a more appropriate default procedure for packages with no homepages then just leaving the invalid 'homepage-link' alone ... Shouldn't there be a way to tell portage

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Meeting Summary (20060112)

2006-01-12 Thread solar
Monthly Gentoo Council Meeting for Jan 2006. Present: Koon (Thierry Carrez) Swift (Sven Vermeulen) agriffis (Aron Griffis) seemant (Seemant Kulleen) solar (Ned Ludd) vapier (Mike Frysinger) Absent: azarah (Martin Schlemmer) Where abouts unknown for the last 30 days. Attendance

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-webrsync patch

2006-01-12 Thread Johannes Fahrenkrug
Brian Harring wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:15:00AM +0100, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: if [[ -n $PORTAGE_NICENESS ]] ! [[ -z $WE_ARE_NICED ]]; then Haven't looked at the patch yet, but a bit of bash fu for ya- [[ -n $VAR ]] == ! [[ -z $VAR ]] -z is zero length or unset, -n is