[gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi

2006-03-29 Thread foser
Hey, just added a mask for media-gfx/sodipodi. It has been forked into inkscape and sodipodi development subsequently has stagnated. I intend to remove sodipodi in about 7 days. - foser signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Session/.desktop WM compatibility, DM unification

2006-03-29 Thread Dan Armak
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 00:27, foser wrote: I'm aware of the issues surrounding menus, but the spec gives a lot of options. As said, we haven't dealt with it, because it is not a snag that we hit currently. I think we can basically have several menu setups fit for different tasks/DEs and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [last rites] media-gfx/sodipodi

2006-03-29 Thread Mark Loeser
foser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hey, just added a mask for media-gfx/sodipodi. It has been forked into inkscape and sodipodi development subsequently has stagnated. I intend to remove sodipodi in about 7 days. Not directed specifically at you, but it seems a lot of people are masking stuff

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for net-misc/trickle

2006-03-29 Thread Mark Loeser
This package hasn't had an upstream release since June of 2003. Currently it won't compile with gcc-4 (bug #126597), and there are probably a lot of other issues too. No one is maintaining this, so if you want to keep it in the tree, step up and fix it. I'm masking it now, and will be removing

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Marius Mauch
Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for 2.1: enforcing dependencies needed to use the tree (see old threads or glep44 for reasoning). A patch for that is available at dev.gentoo.org/~genone/patches/treedeps.diff. Unless somebody

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Brian Harring
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:21:15PM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote: Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for 2.1: enforcing dependencies needed to use the tree (see old threads or glep44 for reasoning). A patch for that is available

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-29 Thread Brian Harring
On 3/29/06, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:30:17 +0900 Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:21, Marius Mauch wrote: Marius Mauch schrieb: So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is a requirement for