On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:10:01 +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
with the trustee voting process coming up i thought i should get on the ball
and give a brief overview of the current Council election process
so can people check out the new Voting section and tell me what ya'll think:
On Saturday 22 April 2006 06:30, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:10:01 +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote:
with the trustee voting process coming up i thought i should get on the
ball and give a brief overview of the current Council election process
so can people check out the
On Friday 21 April 2006 19:40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
with the trustee voting process coming up i thought i should get on the
ball and give a brief overview of the current Council election process
so can people check out the new Voting section and tell me what ya'll
think:
www-client/amaya is without an active maintainer and has an open
security bug :
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129874
It needs a bump to 9.5, and it also needs a maintainer/herd. If nobody
steps in to fix it, package will have to be masked then removed from
portage.
--
Thierry Carrez
Hi!
I'm using UTF-8 encoding in my system. The main problem is, that lots
of /usr/share/man/* and /usr/share/doc/* files are iso8859-2 encoded (as my
LINGUAS is set to pl). I think, that Portage itself should recode all the
files, which go to /usr/share/man/ and /usr/share/doc/ directories to
Damian Szeluga wrote:
I'm using UTF-8 encoding in my system. The main problem is, that lots
of /usr/share/man/* and /usr/share/doc/* files are iso8859-2 encoded (as my
LINGUAS is set to pl). I think, that Portage itself should recode all the
files, which go to /usr/share/man/ and
Hi,
The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
the stand-alone module since March 2005.
Unless somebody has a really good reason as to why we should keep the
external module in portage I will
Hi,
at the moment, /usr/lib/pppd/2.4.2/rp-pppoe.so is installed by
net-dialup/ppp - nothing special - well, it's not a very recent version.
In the syslog it says:
RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.2
On the other hand, i've got net-dialup/rp-pppoe-3.8 installed and it
Mike Frysinger wrote:
for you peeps who want to give this a shot, sync up and try glibc-2.4-r2.
hopefully i wont have [m]any more changes to make before i release it into
~arch.
pretty cool. couple dumb questions though.
one, does this make the compile time explode? IIRC that was one of
On Saturday 22 April 2006 10:02, Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
Damian Szeluga wrote:
There's also a problem with Groff, which is unable to show
unicode chars correctly. I made a package to solve it
(http://hoth.amu.edu.pl/~d_szeluga/groff-utf8.tar.bz2), but I think it's
a bit dirty hack.
I am
On Saturday 22 April 2006 12:18, R Hill wrote:
one, does this make the compile time explode? IIRC that was one of the
original reasons userlocales was introduced.
no, the compile times are the same with locale-gen as with USE=userlocales ...
it's simply a different way of doing it
Sun
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
the stand-alone module since March 2005.
Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
the stand-alone module since March 2005.
Is
On Saturday 22 April 2006 15:46, Tim Yamin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
next few weeks?
What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile
against linux-2.4.x anyways.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default is to
generate *all* locales
can you magically migrate the existing /etc/locales.build to
/etc/locales.gen?
regards,
Tuan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
i think that i did it this is the amaya-9.5.ebuild attached it's
working for me and i hope it'll work for every one.
it builds amaya-9.5-fullsrc not with all its dependencies (freetype -
wxwidgets - mesa) these are installed locally into amaya folder so
they won't affect the original system ones
i think that i did it this is the amaya-9.5.ebuild attached it's
working for me and i hope it'll work for every one.
it builds amaya-9.5-fullsrc with all its dependencies (freetype -
wxwidgets - mesa) these are installed locally into amaya folder so
they won't affect the original system ones - i
Here is the newest revision of my proposal. Not much has changed, but I
added and changed some small things. Constructive feedback is
appreciated. I'd like to get this voted on by the council at the next
meeting.
* The QA team's purpose is to provide cross-team assistance in keeping
the tree
* In case of emergency, or if package maintainers refuse to cooperate,
the QA team may take action themselves to fix the problem. The QA
team does not want to override the maintainer's wishes by default, but only
wish to do so when the team finds it is in the best interest of users
and
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
next few weeks?
What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile
against linux-2.4.x anyways.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* QA will take an active role in cleaning up unmaintained and broken
packages from the tree.
I hope this is meant to read more like:
QA will take an active role in cleaning up unmaintained packages from
the tree if they are severly broken or
Thomas Cort wrote:
* The QA team will maintain a list of current QA Standards with
explanations as to why they are problems, and how to fix the problem.
The list is not meant by any means to be a comprehensive document
Why isn't this list meant to be comprehensive? I know that there will
23 matches
Mail list logo
