060505 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
Although modular, KDE 3.5 has to go stable _at once_
and if KMail is totally broken or has major feature loss, we can't.
I've seen this stated before, but why does it have to be _at once_ ?
Many packages have 1 stable version available,
so users might
The repository for SDCC has recently moved from CVS to Subversion. From now on,
please use dev-embedded/sdcc-svn instead of dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs.
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month or
so if nobody complains.
Denis.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
dev-embedded/sdcc-cvs will be masked right now, and then removed in a month or
so if nobody complains.
A pkg move might be wise to do, no?
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 5/4/06, Bart Braem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes us think we can not trust the KDE devs?
1. bugs.gentoo.org
2. bugs.kde.org
I personally have been running KDE 3.5 since the RC days...when you
actually had to add it to package.unmask. And *yes*, it has had more
than it's share of
On 5/5/06, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
060504 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If we followed others blindly, as so many users suggest,
then we would have stabilized KDE 3.5 ages ago,
and every single one of you KDE users would be complaining
about how our QA sucks because KDE doesn't
On 5/5/06, Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the whining leaves me with the feeling that I'm less interested to work
for you. The question What can I do? I do never hear. Stop whining, but
decide to help or give another distro a try. These are your choices.
Just to try to counter
On Saturday 06 May 2006 08:48, Philip Webb wrote:
I've seen this stated before, but why does it have to be _at once_ ?
Because 3.4 and 3.5 does _NOT_ mix together!
Many packages have 1 stable version available,
so users might have KDE 3.4.3 (all) 3.5.1 (parts) by now,
with the rest of
060506 Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
On Saturday 06 May 2006 08:48, Philip Webb wrote:
I've seen this stated before, but why does it have to be _at once_ ?
Because 3.4 and 3.5 does _NOT_ mix together!
That's not an explanation: it merely restates your assertion.
Many packages have 1
Philip Webb wrote:
Any stable version of KDE will need kdelibs kdebase ,
but otherwise why can't the packages be made stable
at least as each big downloadable file becomes ready, if not individually ?
Because they have to be stable at once. Period.
Can't go stable piece by piece. Period.
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
on Sat, 06 May 2006 13:41:50 +0200:
Any stable version of KDE will need kdelibs kdebase , but otherwise why
can't the packages be made stable at least as each big downloadable file
becomes ready, if not individually ?
Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the
teams maintaining those herds, others might face extinction w/o a direct
maintainer.
On Sat, 06 May 2006 21:22:56 -0700
Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed a disturbing trend with the website redesign. Larry is
disappearing from the site.
That is utterly disturbing! I too enjoy Larry the cow, and would like to keep
him around and improve his visibility on the
Thomas Cort wrote:
On Sat, 06 May 2006 21:22:56 -0700
Joshua Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've noticed a disturbing trend with the website redesign. Larry is
disappearing from the site.
That is utterly disturbing! I too enjoy Larry the cow, and would like to keep
him around and improve
Thomas Cort wrote:
That is utterly disturbing! I too enjoy Larry the cow, and would like to keep
him around and improve his visibility on the site. I think he makes a nice
mascot for Gentoo.
I completely agree. Let's not try to change things that have been part
and parcel of Gentoo for
14 matches
Mail list logo
