Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:14 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
How exactly is it easier to manage a large number of ebuilds versus a
small number?
It is easier to manage one large overlay than managing 35 small overlays.
Communication overhead, duplication of effort,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:27:29 -0400
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[lots of good stuff - +lots Chris]
Not so many moons ago, new ebuilds were submitted to bugzilla. The
bug wranglers would assign the bugs to the team most likely to end up
as the maintainers, and new ebuilds either
On Вск, 2006-06-11 at 02:16 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:11:50 +0200
Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b) Localization of Gentoo-developed applications (portage,
gentoolkit,...) including their manpages
I don't really like this one. Documentation, sure, but for the
On 6/10/06, Jan Kundrát [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, let's rephrase it a bit. The following items represent my view about
the i18n team's responsibilities:
a) Translation of metadata.xml stuff in our tree (Is there any method to
keep them up-to-date when the English text changes? Something like
Daniel Drake wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
maybe give ebuilds a way to maintain a list of files that portage
should nuke when unmerging the package ...
Something similar to this would be useful for kernel ebuilds, as simply
unmerging kernel source will leave a load of temporary and object
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Just a note that no-one took over maintainership of the perforce packages,
so I've removed them from the tree.
I've archived a copy in my personal overlay, just in case there are any
Gentoo users out there who'd like to help maintain them. If
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Olivier Crete wrote:
Is there a recent list of non-ported packages ? Maybe we should do a
last effort to port everything for a week or two and then package.mask
the packages that no one cares enough about to port them.
Hmmm, not a up2date one, AFAIK...
On Sunday 11 June 2006 05:01, Jakub Moc wrote:
Daniel Drake wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
maybe give ebuilds a way to maintain a list of files that portage
should nuke when unmerging the package ...
Something similar to this would be useful for kernel ebuilds, as simply
unmerging
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the publication
is always on time (whatever that may be). If it's a bi-weekly
publication it doesn't always
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's demands
as well.
While I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:00:43 +0200
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 11:37 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's
release. I seriously doubt
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:37:15PM +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and various
other people for help here), we now have a resolution that should
satisfy all involved parties here. This should adress dostrow's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[. . .]
Right on! :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEi/j4rsJQqN81j74RAsRHAKCJsN09KKGlLq5CD4Bh/7r9QYJ12QCgnFx1
lRWrDI1euePCP0MrwoP/Emg=
=G9qu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Marius Mauch wrote:
genone and my point is that users often don't even realize that
their post contains non-english text
Make Portage add a line with Some of the previous errors were reported
in non-English language. If you want to get support from official
channel, please run `LC_ALL=C
Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
On Сбт, 2006-06-10 at 15:11 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
a) Translation of metadata.xml stuff in our tree (Is there any method to
keep them up-to-date when the English text changes? Something like
revision attribute that gets bumped when the English text gets updated?)
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
Keep only English in metadata.xml. Using tools such as intltool or
xml2po to extract strings and let i18n translate/maintain .po files
themselves. Generated .mo files will be included in metadata directory
when rsycing. Another portage hack to use .mo files in
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application;
emerge application
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their
support files), i think it's really helpfull.
It's exactly the same as
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 07:33:19 -0400
Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:37:15 +0200, Markus Ullmann wrote:
1) m-w / m-n requirement
Only ebuilds that are reported to bugzie (valid bug#) and set to
maintainer-wanted are allowed here as well as maintainer-needed
ones.
Peter wrote:
Um, there are numerous new not-in-portage-tree ebuilds submitted to bz
which have been assigned to teams. However, they may still languish. They
were assigned by the wranglers, and not improperly. Yet, for many reasons,
the bugs wait. So, will there be a mechanism for a
After waiting for my replies for 24+ hours I presume they disappeared
into a blackhole while we were lacking lists, so I'm resending.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting:
The reply appears to have disappeared into a black hole.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:26:31 +0100
On Sat,
Another vanishing reply from yesterday.
Forwarded Message
From: Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] July Council Meeting: Requested Agenda Item
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:44:02 +0100
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:56
Jakub Moc wrote:
Donnie, pingy! ;) Just a friendly reminder to run the script again, so
that we can do a last attempt on fixing the remaining stuff before
resorting to more drastic solutions...
Yeah, it's on my list, but I've got family here all weekend so no time
to work on stuff.
Thanks,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
While I do think this proposal is much better than the previous
non-existing proposal, it still doesn't address the problem of having
the sunrise overlay hosted on a non *.gentoo.org address to make it
100% clear to the public that it is unsupported.
It's no more
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:42:19PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application;
emerge application
As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 04:01:50PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
You need to ask a team member then to move them to maintainer-wanted.
Usually the teams have no problem with moving bugs over to
maintainer-wanted because they know that they cannot maintain everything
themselves.
But Project
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It's no more or less supported than anything else on
overlays.gentoo.org. The word overlays ought to be enough. I suppose
you oppose the whole concept, anyhow?
No, I am certainly not opposed to overlays in general. I even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
| However, as has been pointed out several times in this thread already,
| back when the devloper community agreed to the overlays project it was
| also agreed that projects similar to what is now known as Project
|
Dan Meltzer wrote:
On 6/10/06, Markus Ullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Not one large tree but subdirs, one per herd
to help herds better keeping track of which parts are alive in the
overlay, each herd's ebuilds are grouped in a subdir, e.g. there will be
a netmon/ dir with
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 05:50:05PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
As for why the Council, because thats what people suggested when I asked
which route to take when he was unresponsive.
I see, and that puts your suggestion of conctacting the council in a
different angle.
[some stuff
Ryan Hill wrote:
2. People who contribute good ebuilds over a certain period of time are
allowed upon decision by project devs to actively help maintaining the
project. They'll be given commit rights for the project then. Same frome
above applies here: If we notice any abuse, we revoke access
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
| However, as has been pointed out several times in this thread already,
| back when the devloper community agreed to the overlays project it was
| also
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 09:27 +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:28:36AM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
Council? Why escalate things? Have you talked to Ulrich
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:07 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
Congratulations. I just unsubscribed from the
gwn-feedback-alias after reading your mail.
* Christel Dahlskjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/06/10 04:28 +0100]:
1. Reliability. The GWN claims to be a weekly publication, yet it
frequently
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 10:56 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 03:28 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
I would like to ask that the Council discuss the current state and
future of the GWN at their next meeting.
I don't think you have to escalate that far. We should be able to
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:56:48 +0200 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy
| should be sent to the relevant people to ensure that they are ok
| with what is being posted (my dev of the week interview, for
| example, was rather
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying trend.
One of my blog entries
Stefan Schweizer schrieb:
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 13:37:15 +0200
Markus Ullmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so after figuring out open problems (thanks to kloeri and
various other people for help here), we now have a resolution that
should satisfy all involved parties
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it is however a worrying
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:13:36PM +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
To take an example, there were made up quotes in my GWN interview,
however, nothing of great harm. I believe that time it was a case of
attempting to make it more fun, it
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 15545 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
Hello,
Now that there is a new version of portage out (2.1), I updated my
portage cache progress patch. If the --verbose option is given, it
shows more information while updating the portage cache.
normal behavior:
Updating Portage cache: 18%
verbose behavior:
Updating Portage cache:
42 matches
Mail list logo
