On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 10:50:18PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 30 June 2006 21:54, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is Tom.
Congratulations Paul :)
Now you can join that club of old geezers :P
ps. If I'm a bit
Well, I've been reading the dev mailing-list for a while now, and... I
think there could not be a better first message : congratulations Paul
!
He really is a very nice baby. Hope The mother feels good too.
I wish you a lot of happiness (x3) !
Best regards,
2006/6/30, Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages
are now in the tree because of it? What new developers have been
recruited because of it? What packages that were previously without
maintainers in the tree have
I was going to add graphviz as a local use flag to kdevelop, when I found
these:
use.local.desc:media-gfx/imagemagick:graphviz - enable graphviz support
use.local.desc:media-gfx/k3d:graphviz - Add graphviz support
use.local.desc:net-analyzer/scapy:graphviz - Enable graphviz support
On Monday 03 July 2006 08:06, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages
are now in the tree because of it? What new developers have been
recruited because of it? What packages
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 08:30:42AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 08:06, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
What has the existence of Sunrise done for Gentoo? What new packages
are now in the tree because of it? What
Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz,
and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity
of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting
that a Virtualization herd be formed to handle these packages. I was
also going to
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:50, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
No, brix is certainly not happy with a overlay like sunrise in any
official capacity.
then he needs to voice his concerns
we've had a few threads calling for people to list their problems so they can
be addressed and i dont recall anyone
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:43:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:50, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
No, brix is certainly not happy with a overlay like sunrise in any
official capacity.
then he needs to voice his concerns
we've had a few threads calling for people to
On Monday 03 July 2006 14:47, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
I have no problem with Project Sunrise being an unofficial project,
which is why I haven't responded to those mails.
the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns to that
sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo
-mike
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns
to that sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo
Really? According to who?
We only just had the userrel + sunrise meeting where the people behind
Project Sunrise
On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote:
Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz,
and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity
of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting
that a Virtualization herd be
On Monday 03 July 2006 15:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns
to that sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo
Really? According to who?
presumably the Sunrise guys
Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of
virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems
more fitting to group those packages together.
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:48 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote:
Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of
virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems
more fitting to group those packages together.
not really, bochs, qemu and vmware is emulation, merely
On Monday 03 July 2006 22:28, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote:
Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of
virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems
more fitting to group those packages together.
That's what I was trying to say is that bochs/qemu/vmware are emulation
since they emulate x86 hardware, though I would see some good by
including Xen and User-mode Linux with the VPS Project, since that seems
fitting. Oh yeah, don't forget vmware-server, that's supposely supposed
to be used in
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 15:41, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:55PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the entire point of these threads is to address developer concerns
to that sunrise can be folded back into Gentoo
Really? According to who?
Hi
I'm glad to announce a new sub project from Gentoo Science. The Physics
sub project!
You may noticed i created a new category on the tree and moved a few
packages from another categories to the new one.
Now the future is to maintain and add new applications to provide the
best platform for
Hi
I'm glad to announce a new sub project from Gentoo Science. The Physics
sub project!
You may noticed i created a new category on the tree and moved a few
packages from another categories to the new one.
Now the future is to maintain and add new applications to provide the
best platform for
If you have an ebuild with a non-standard pkg_nofetch, please ensure
that you use $SRC_URI instead of $A!
This is because if you have FEATURES=mirror or FEATURES=cvs, attempts to
download all of the source files for digesting or verification will hit
pkg_nofetch and $A is only the subset of
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 22:28 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote:
Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of
virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems
more fitting to group those packages
Generating root filesystems for UML and Xen are basically the same
process. I've heard of domi, but, bleh, I never could get it to work. I
usually just make my images in chroot, and that usually works well. But,
since the images are *basically* the same, that means it would be
possible to use the
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If you have an ebuild with a non-standard pkg_nofetch, please ensure
that you use $SRC_URI instead of $A!
This is because if you have FEATURES=mirror or FEATURES=cvs, attempts to
download all of the source files for digesting or verification will hit
pkg_nofetch and
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 07:13:35PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
If you have an ebuild with a non-standard pkg_nofetch, please ensure
that you use $SRC_URI instead of $A!
This is because if you have FEATURES=mirror or FEATURES=cvs, attempts to
download all of
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 20:15 -0600, Nick Devito wrote:
Generating root filesystems for UML and Xen are basically the same
process. I've heard of domi, but, bleh, I never could get it to work. I
usually just make my images in chroot, and that usually works well. But,
since the images are
26 matches
Mail list logo
