-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuan Van wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Ser Gio wrote:
Hello,
Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the X useflag? The ebuild doesn't
look like it's using it.
thanks,
Sérgio
Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.
I hate
Michael Cummings wrote:
I hate it when this happens.
I have an ebuild inherits perl-app. It pulls in minimal and perl
USE-flags. kinda misleading.
Tuan
The perl use flag is to avoid make perl a dep for every package that
inherits the eclass even if perl isn't in your personal USE flags.
On Friday 14 July 2006 06:03, Daniel Watkins wrote:
Is there a rationale behind this decision?
On some systems libmad does not work and has to be masked, if I called it mp3,
it couldn't be use.masked or all the mp3 supports, even when not provided by
libmad, would have been removed.
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 05:03 +0100, Daniel Watkins wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seems to me that having both of these two flags can only cause confusion.
I upgraded xine-lib yesterday and spent a very frustrating 2 hours trying
to work out what had broken my Amarok
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 16:20 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Per-package use.mask is not here for another year and in the mean time I
needed a working solution, this is it.
While it is a working solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one.
If the package only uses libmad, and libmad
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:38, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If a user has USE=mp3 -mad then they should *always* have working mp3
support.
Give me per-package use.mask baby, and I'll do whatever you want.
But as when I asked it was considered low priority, then you can start
barking at portage devs,
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on $platform,
| then why not simply disable mp3 support on that platform until libmad
| is fixed?
Because it confuses the hell out of users who want to know why
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
While it is a working solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one.
You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer.
As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until portage
devs implements the per-package
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:23:06PM +0200, Matthias Schwarzott [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 July 2006 15:16, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Hi all,
thanks to djm's efforts i was just able to scan the whole tree using
qualudis. For a start, i'll attach a list of QA violations on missing
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi,
On 7/11/06, Gustavo Felisberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm removing net-misc/ssh from the tree as Tectia no longer provides a
free
version of they're ssh client and server. The last update to this
package was
one year and half so I'm a bit afraid of security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote:
But as when I asked it was considered low priority, then you can start
barking at portage devs, instead of me.
I know some of us arch team ninjas asked for this in bug #96368 some time
ago.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on $platform,
| then why not simply disable mp3 support on that platform until libmad
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:49:47 +0100 Daniel Watkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on
| | $platform, then why not simply disable mp3
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on $platform,
| then why not simply disable mp3 support on that platform until libmad
| is fixed?
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:09 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
While it is a working solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one.
You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer.
Quite honestly, I don't care.
As this, as
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 06:03, Daniel Watkins wrote:
Is there a rationale behind this decision?
On some systems libmad does not work and has to be masked, if I called it
mp3,
it couldn't be use.masked or all the mp3 supports, even when not provided by
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:14:39 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 15:59 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:43:54 -0400 Chris Gianelloni
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | If the package only uses libmad, and libmad doesn't work on
| |
On Friday 14 July 2006 20:20, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
See, it is this kind of self-serving attitude that really needs to stop
around here. So the portage devs didn't include something that you
wanted in the latest release... Did you give them a patch for it?
Do I ask people to give me patches
On Friday 14 July 2006 20:24, Simon Stelling wrote:
In the specific case of xine-lib, the mad USE flag can simply be replaced
with mp3 because mips, which is the only arch that has the mad USE flag in
use.mask, doesn't have any version keyworded.
If I revert the change, mips won't be able to
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 14:20 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:09 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
While it is a working solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one.
You can take over xine-lib and fix it
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:45, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-qt +qt3:
This would only be available in 2 cases:
- Package supports both qt4 and qt3, and they're mutually exclusive
- Package supports both qt4 and qt3, and they can both be enabled at once
In case 1, -qt +qt3 would enable qt3. In
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:09:15PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 15:45, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-qt +qt3:
This would only be available in 2 cases:
- Package supports both qt4 and qt3, and they're mutually exclusive
- Package supports both qt4 and qt3, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Per-package use.mask is not here for another year and in the mean time I
needed a working solution, this is it.
It think we can have it sooner than another year. There are lots of fixes in
2.1.1_pre and I'd like
On Friday 14 July 2006 22:24, Zac Medico wrote:
It think we can have it sooner than another year. There are lots of
fixes in 2.1.1_pre and I'd like to close the merge window pretty soon so
that it can be stabilized. I'll work on a patch for package.use and
package.use.mask so that we should
24 matches
Mail list logo
