On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:04:11 +0200
Martin Schlemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyhow, that is the whole issue with mozilla stuff in general - huge
hunk of code that is not really modular, and have to be rebuild for a
few to many projects. While I am all for getting the POS more modular
(which
Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:00:39 +0100:
The testing is supposed to be for the ebuild, not the package itself,
so there's not much point in holding back packages with simple ebuilds
from being stabilised.
While ~arch is
On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 18:28 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
On Wed, Jul 5, 2006 at 18:20:08 +0200, Patrick McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to nominate:
vapier/SpanKY
flameeyes
Kugelfang
uberlord
wolf31o2
seemant
solar
Mr_Bones_
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 10:00 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
I would also like to see that (though maybe with some automated
feedback from users systems as to which packages are installed / how
often they are run). All that the current process ensures is that:
Any automated system will cause
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 10:34 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
Maybe this semi-automatic stabilisation by default could be adopted by
the tree cleaners project?
I propose that we remove the name project from any team that really
consists of only one or two people. I think part of the problem is that
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 12:19 +, Duncan wrote:
Chris Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:00:39 +0100:
The testing is supposed to be for the ebuild, not the package itself,
so there's not much point in holding back packages with
The sys-apps/hwdata package isn't marked stable on any architecture. It
is the upstream Red Hat version of the package, and was the last version
that would work successfully with hwsetup as we use on the releases.
Since this won't be getting any updates from upstream (as they've moved
onto an
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I'd say no bugs, 30 days, passes internal tests, being run by users =
stablise, for the majority of packages (obviously, there may be some
exceptions...).
Luckily, you're not making the call. ;]
The majority of packages are also the ones that need more extensive
* Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
1) thousands of packages will never be marked stable
Honestly, they shouldn't be stable.
hmm, maybe we should have different groups of ports (*1) for
a) quite stable: no bugs yet and enough votes)
b) *proven* to be stable: has passed
* Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
snip
That's actually how I read the first email, was that it's really the
majority of the _minor_ packages that get completely neglected, and
just sits in the tree for months or years marked unstable because
nobody cares.
then the users probably
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
27 Jul 2006 10:25:52 -0400:
Since the introduction of the x86 architecture team, we have had a
significant slowdown in the stabilization of packages in the tree.
However, we have also gotten numerous emails
On 7/27/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Honestly, they shouldn't be stable. In fact, likely, many shouldn't be
in the tree. We have way too many packages that are used solely by a
small group of people sitting around the tree. These would be better
served in official overlays,
To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
Sunrise is about contributing ebuilds and getting feedback and review while
doing so. The main resource this currently happens for is the Gentoo User
Overlay of Sunrise and second come ebuilds that get into portage afterwards
In last weeks council
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
The Gentoo vmware team have been developing new ebuilds for
vmware-workstation, vmware-player and vmware-server (and
vmware-server-console), to help ease the maintenance of the shared
modules and shared patches between these products.
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the Sunrise project is
no longer suspended. I can give a short overview of the current status of
the overlay:
- we currently have 154 ebuilds in 58 categories in the overlay
not counting the ebuilds that got into
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
Eso since when did we have the discussion where you actually
addressed all of the numerous concerns brought forth right before this
project was initially suspended?
Do you have any concrete concerns that have not been dealt with yet? I would
like to hear about
To my former fellow Gentoo developers and users,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:58:09PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
To my fellow Gentoo developers and users,
In last weeks council meeting [1] it was decided that the Sunrise project is
no longer suspended. I can give a short overview of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello everyone,
Here, with this email, i propose (after a brief discussion on irc with
gensteaf)an alternative or at least a new model to address a few issues
with our maintainers needs and the inclusion of new packages into the
tree. Probably an
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 22:19:14 -0400
Luis Francisco Araujo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The users explicitly compromise to (just to make it clear): [1,2,3,4]
People who participate in open projects like Gentoo come and go. What
happens if/when the proxy maintainer decides to leave? Who will take
care
19 matches
Mail list logo
