Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wulf hails from Altrip, Germany. It seems the German conspiracy just
keeps growing and growing. Wulf is going to work on KDE so don't be
surprised if you see him talking about Dolphins and Solids in
#gentoo-dev.
At least KDE got some backup...
Welcome.
V-Li
On Sonntag, 8. April 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sys-power/nvram-wakeup
VDR-Team can look at it.
Matthias
--
Matthias Schwarzott (zzam)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Peter Weller wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:19:23 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
working here is no longer fun
* HUGZ *
Hoi! Giving hugs is a right reserved by me and me only! :P
/me hugs Mike
/me stabs welp
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Michael Cummings ha scritto:
Been a while, upstream moved on in life but we continued to get interested
users
filing bugs, so
genlop-0.30.6 went into the tree this morning. Primarily a bug fix release
based
on what was open in bugs.gentoo.org. Enjoy :)
Imho is a waste of time to
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 02:28:52PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote:
Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
things (genloop and qlop)
gollee, we wouldn't want competing products, would we? I mean, imagine if
someone tried writing a competitor for emerge??
:P
This
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:28:52 +0200
Timothy Redaelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
things (genloop and qlop)
Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date, for
example).
Also, as long as involved people
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Andrej Kacian wrote:
Timothy Redaelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imho is a waste of time to maintain two projects which does the same
things (genloop and qlop)
Perhaps because each has features that the other doesn't (genlop's --date,
for example).
because i havent
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:29 +0200, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Why not simply allow trustees to veto a council decision ? This does
not give trustees enough power to be a second council, but would
permit them to stop something that they believe will damage Gentoo.
This is very
Michael Cummings wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:43:58AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
-t fixed (not in svn yet, but it was an easy thing to fix)
trying to compile something that should take more than an hour on my box to
make
sure -c is fixed also. Sorry about the shoddy release,
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
doubt it'll be possible to convince the developers to merge here ... genlop
is
written in perl and qlop is written in C ...
-mike
Maybe we can do this as another 99bottle ;)
For those who don't know what it is about, look it up here ...
Hi everyone,
as everyone probably noticed, there is a current atmosphere of sinking ship,
with quite a lot of people leaving and many agreeing that gentoo is no fun
working on anymore. Before it's too late, I'd like to propose a big reformation
that would help solve some of the issues we are
Alexandre Buisse kirjoitti:
Hi everyone,
as everyone probably noticed, there is a current atmosphere of sinking ship,
with quite a lot of people leaving and many agreeing that gentoo is no fun
working on anymore. Before it's too late, I'd like to propose a big
reformation
that would help
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 21:32 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
work. Stage 4's were going in this direction, but they were too isolated and,
as
far as I know, they are dead now.
Wow. I'm glad to see that yet another thing I spend so much time
working on is marginalized or otherwise discounted
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date. Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you
Petteri Räty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date. Then we require this file to be updated
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion date.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 22:32:20 +0200, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 21:32 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
work. Stage 4's were going in this direction, but they were too isolated
and, as
far as I know, they are dead now.
Wow. I'm glad to see that yet another thing I
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Then we require this file to be updated
monthly. What do you think?
I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has
been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough
On 4/10/07, Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
as everyone probably noticed, there is a current atmosphere of sinking ship,
with quite a lot of people leaving and many agreeing that gentoo is no fun
working on anymore. Before it's too late, I'd like to propose a big
Alexandre Buisse kirjoitti:
What I *want* to do is to make gentoo fun again. And I believe that
decentralising and giving more autonomy to people will achieve exactly
that, for reasons explained in the proposal.
I am a project lead for two projects and have no idea what kind of more
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:34:25PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated completion
Petteri Räty wrote:
Alexandre Buisse kirjoitti:
What I *want* to do is to make gentoo fun again. And I believe that
decentralising and giving more autonomy to people will achieve exactly
that, for reasons explained in the proposal.
I am a project lead for two projects and have no
On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
I propose we extend project xml to describe current stuff going on in the
project in question and their estimated completion date.
mmm good ...
Then we require this file to be updated monthly.
... not so good
-mike
pgpz8Qu87JVkL.pgp
Bryan Østergaard kirjoitti:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:34:25PM +0300, Petteri R??ty wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 22:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's just so easy to step on other
ppls feet these days ;)
I tend to agree that this is a problem, but only insofar as we've become
too territorial. Many times I see bugs filed with seemingly minor
Alexandre Buisse a écrit :
[snip]
My experience is limited to the gnome packages and just based on those,
your proposal is already not doable.
Gnome deps on :
- core glib/gtk packages, used by many other packages, including
server packages, but owned by the gnome herd
- dbus/hal, handled by
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Stupid question... what's the diff between doconfd and newconfd?
Ha.. I remember now... Thanks robbat2 for kicking me in the head to jog
my memory...
Care to share? ;)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Steve Long kirjoitti:
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Stupid question... what's the diff between doconfd and newconfd?
Ha.. I remember now... Thanks robbat2 for kicking me in the head to jog
my memory...
Care to share? ;)
man 5 ebuild. Use #gentoo-dev-help next time.
Regards,
Petteri
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:25 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:34:25 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the recent thread showed there is a lot going on in Gentoo land
although it doesn't always seem so. I propose we extend project xml to
describe current stuff going on in the project in question and their
estimated
Raúl Porcel wrote:
Peter Weller wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 20:19:23 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
working here is no longer fun
* HUGZ *
Hoi! Giving hugs is a right reserved by me and me only! :P
/me hugs Mike
/me stabs welp
Miaow! There's plenty
... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your
friggin packages alive and working?
I'm so sick to hear people crying that noone is around to tell them what
to do..
So here is my proposal:
ABSTAIN!
That's it for now :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:32:49 +0200
Alexandre Buisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Please criticize this with everything constructive you can think of.
This idea of putting almost everything into its own repo/overlay will IMO end
up in the same mess that several other distros have with tons
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:56:40 Benedikt Boehm wrote:
... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your
friggin packages alive and working?
Indeed!!
Doing an emerge --deep --update world last week b0rked updating about a
couple of dozen packages. Evenutally I realized
Matthias Langer wrote:
Well, I don't know what your problem really is about; I'm running x86,
and if something breaks on my system, it's mostly not because of broken
packages, but because I should have been informed about possible issues
that could have been caused by an upgrade, and how to
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:56:40 Benedikt Boehm wrote:
... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your
friggin packages alive and working?
Indeed!!
Doing an emerge --deep --update world last week b0rked updating about a
couple of dozen
36 matches
Mail list logo
