On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:07:28 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please reply on gentoo-portage-dev, _not_ on gentoo-dev, thanks.
One missing feature in portage is the lack of package sets. Before we
(re)start working on that however I'd like to get some feedback about
what
--- Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is a
PDEPEND possible?
I followed your suggestion and posted a couple of
ebuilds for the upcoming Shorewall 4 package:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174588
I am not seeing cyclic dependency issues anymore.
Thanks for any
As we know from previous bugs and mails here on -dev, bitchx is pretty
much unmaintained and now has an open security bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183149
So if no-one wants to take it, p.masking it in a week from now and
remove it regular 30 days after.
-Jokey
signature.asc
Markus Ullmann wrote:
As we know from previous bugs and mails here on -dev, bitchx is pretty
much unmaintained and now has an open security bug.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183149
So if no-one wants to take it, p.masking it in a week from now and
remove it regular 30 days
Hi Luca
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Workalike client suggested?
After using BitchX for several years, I switch to irssi like 2.5 years
ago. It felt like the most similar client, altough they're a bit
different.
Greets,
Michael
--
http://hansmi.ch/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato wrote:
Workalike client suggested?
lu
epic5,epic4,irssi,ircii,ninja,scrollz,weechat
:)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:48:20PM +0200, Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
is there a script to mimic bx in irssi or epic5?
lu
There are specific scripts to minic specific functionality, so whatever
you're missing can probably be replicated. Find a #irssi :)
tomaw
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 15:28:04 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It maybe be Published by some group, but they seem to make no
restrictions whatsoever. As such, I'd personally feel quite happy
using it as-is; I don't think they much care either way :-)
Hmmm.
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so i'd
like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
for example:
default-linux/parent:
../base
default-linux/sh/parent:
..
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 21:10 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wolf31o2
While I thank you for the nomination for next year's Gentoo Council, I
have decided that I no longer wish to be associated with the Gentoo
Council or any other form of management or leadership within
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think it's
any more special than any other TLP.
It is very important in the case of Council members as the Council is
the escalation point for Developer Relations appeals.
--
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think it's
any more special than any other TLP.
It is very important in the case of Council members as the Council is
the escalation point for
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 15:20:55 -0700
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
How is being a devrel member important for the table? I don't think
it's any more special than any other TLP.
It is very important in the case of Council
On Thursday 05 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 12:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
maintaining arch things across multiple operating systems is boring me so
i'd like to start moving to profiles that outline arch-specific details
for example:
default-linux/parent:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
no
-mike
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Are there any crazy upgrade paths like the good old libstdc++ bump?
no
And there was great rejoicing.
--
Jim Ramsay
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 06 July 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
sorry, forgot about ~ia64 as well
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:07:28 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please reply on gentoo-portage-dev, _not_ on gentoo-dev, thanks.
One missing feature in portage is the lack of package sets. Before we
(re)start working on that however I'd like to get some feedback about
what
20 matches
Mail list logo
