Ryan Hill wrote:
Pushing to eliminate one of these options is going to make one group or
the other very annoyed.
++ When in doubt: mechanism, not policy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
# Wulf C. Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (21 Aug 2007)
# Stable version doesn't compile, unstable version is partly broken.
# Application is conceptionally wrong. More details on bug 187251.
# Use app-cdr/koverartist instead.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
app-cdr/kover
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the ssl certs which is a security threat.
The net-nds/openldap package has understood this and calls docert from
On 8/21/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the ssl certs which is a security threat.
The net-nds/openldap
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:12:32PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the ssl certs which is a security threat.
I filed bug #174759
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:12:32PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the
Hi,
With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make xcb
default?
And: How should I handle that? We
On 05:58 Wed 22 Aug , Hanno Böck wrote:
With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make xcb
This patch only makes sure that a newline is inserted before the 'Fetching
binary packages
info ...' line, and changes the yellow and green x's and o's to a single line,
with a
counter variable for each. Example:
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
