On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 23:28 +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
- dev-ruby/ruby-oci8 (mattm)
Will most likely be proxy-maintained by me/ruby herd, see bug 183548
ruby:
- dev-ruby/bluecloth (citizen428)
- dev-ruby/cmdparse (citizen428)
- dev-ruby/glue (citizen428)
- dev-ruby/mega-modules
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:38:15AM +0200, Bo ??rsted Andresen wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 01:33:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive been sending private e-mails as i didnt want to make a lot of noise,
but many of the comments i make i imagine would be applicable to a lot of
people ... i
Hi,
we have now three implementations of locate in the tree that block
each other: sys-apps/{m,r,s}locate
This looks like the classical case for a virtual/locate. Any opinions?
I came across the issue when committing the new package app-emacs/fff
(which is the Emacs equivalent of
Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti:
Hi,
we have now three implementations of locate in the tree that block
each other: sys-apps/{m,r,s}locate
This looks like the classical case for a virtual/locate. Any opinions?
I came across the issue when committing the new package app-emacs/fff
(which is the
On Monday 17 September 2007, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
we have now three implementations of locate in the tree that block
each other: sys-apps/{m,r,s}locate
findutils could provide locate as well, we just disable it
This looks like the classical case for a virtual/locate. Any opinions?
i'd
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I came across the issue when committing the new package
app-emacs/fff (which is the Emacs equivalent of app-vim/locateopen)
to the Emacs overlay; it will be moved to the tree soon.
how is it required ? it just runs `locate` at runtime ?
Yes. And
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[...] app-emacs/fff [...]
how is it required ? it just runs `locate` at runtime ?
Exactly. Pure run-time dependency.
Ulrich
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
we have now three implementations of locate in the tree that block
each other: sys-apps/{m,r,s}locate
This looks like the classical case for a virtual/locate. Any
opinions?
Is there something/how many that will need to depend on that?
I found
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 12:34 +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote:
Am Samstag 15 September 2007 20:46:31 schrieb Chris Gianelloni:
The Friends of Gentoo e.V. have said repeatedly that they have some
agreement with the Foundation.
Said who?
Are you saying they do not?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Here are hopefully the last ones for a while:
maintainer-needed:
- sys-fs/static-dev (johnm)
- dev-ruby/ruby-oci8 (mattm)
- net-analyzer/hyperic-hq-agent (mattm)
For the below listed herds this should just be considered a reminder on what
packages just got dumped in your lap/or which
On Monday 17 September 2007, Christian Heim wrote:
maintainer-needed:
- sys-fs/static-dev (johnm)
belongs in base-system
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ive been sending private e-mails as i didnt want to make a lot of noise, but
many of the comments i make i imagine would be applicable to a lot of
people ... i also see others doing reviews and such
how do people feel about responses ? keep them all on gentoo-dev or start a
new list just for
On Sunday 16 September 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 15 September 2007, Jason Smathers (jsin) wrote:
jsin07/09/15 18:46:49
Log:
Directory /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/app-pda/barry/files added to the
repository
does anyone find cvs directory creation messages useful ?
Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive been sending private e-mails as i didnt want to make a lot of noise, but
many of the comments i make i imagine would be applicable to a lot of
people ... i also see others doing reviews and such
how do people feel about responses ? keep them all on gentoo-dev or
I saw the following in Christian's email, and I thought that was odd,
having never heard of the benchmarks aliases before:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:28:30PM +0200, Christian Heim wrote:
benchmarks:
- app-benchmarks/bonnie++ (johnm)
- app-benchmarks/cpuburn (johnm)
I checked on the aliases
On Monday 17 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
gaim-bugs (B, 285 closed assigned, 19 closed cc)
that's because gaim is dead and it's be re-appropriated to net-im ... if you
want, change the bugs db so that all those bugs get reassigned to net-im
(doing a mass-reassignment via bugzilla
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:20:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 17 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
gaim-bugs (B, 285 closed assigned, 19 closed cc)
that's because gaim is dead and it's be re-appropriated to net-im ... if you
want, change the bugs db so that all those bugs
Mike Frysinger wrote:
ive been sending private e-mails as i didnt want to make a lot of noise, but
many of the comments i make i imagine would be applicable to a lot of
people ... i also see others doing reviews and such
how do people feel about responses ? keep them all on gentoo-dev or
One of the (too many) things we need to do to get wxGTK-2.8 into the tree is
lock all packages in portage with wxGTK DEPENDS to the 2.6 SLOT. This is
because the way the eclass works requires ebuilds to specify the SLOT they need
in order to know what configuration scripts to use. (ie. an
19 matches
Mail list logo
