On 18:58 Sun 04 Nov , Caleb Tennis (caleb) wrote:
1.1 sys-libs/db/db-4.6.21.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-libs/db/db-4.6.21.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +, Roy Marples wrote:
As it seems too few people really accept your suggestion, I feel it's
time for me to chime in
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +, Roy Marples wrote:
As it seems too few people really
On Friday 02 November 2007 02:59:36 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Could you drop the icc USE flag? All you need to do is make sure this
package respects CC, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, and users can take care of the
rest in make.conf.
I never put it in and just left it alone as I don't use ICC. I have
On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
(kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
each package
With Uberlord's retirement we should do the usual magic voodoo
procedure to summon in the next-in-line member (which would be Jokey if
i'm not mistaken).
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne (at) gentoo.org
Gentoo Forums - http://forums.gentoo.org
forum-mods (at) gentoo.org
Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
(kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
each package that needs it.
Some
On 14:23 Mon 05 Nov , Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
1.1 net-firewall/ipset/ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-firewall/ipset/ipset-2.3.0.20070828.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
On 14:58 Mon 05 Nov , Piotr Jaroszynski (peper) wrote:
1.1 sys-apps/paludis/paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/paludis/paludis-0.26.0_alpha3.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
On Monday 05 November 2007, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility
support in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
(kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't
On Monday 05 November 2007, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:13 +, Roy Marples wrote:
While I still have access to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email, I'll respond here.
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 10:22 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 00:47 +,
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Actually you missed the mark completely.
Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's
the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *could*
be /bin/sh and on the systems where /bin/sh is not
On 05-11-2007 20:32:09 +, Roy Marples wrote:
More (generic) unix-able.
Exactly so :)
Not really as long as not being bourne shell compatible like autoconf's
configure. I won't trust to have a POSIX shell like /bin/ksh everywhere,
but /bin/sh only, which usually is just a
On Monday 05 November 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 14:21 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Actually you missed the mark completely.
Nothing in the tree itself specifies what shell to use - instead it's
the package manager. So the PM on Gentoo/Linux/FreeBSD *could*
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 16:21 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
we want the installed environment to be portable, not the build environment.
i do not see any benefit from forcing the build environment to be pure POSIX
compliant and i see many many detrimental problems.
Oh I don't know. Imagine how
Attached are the packages scheduled for removal this week, extended
one day to include the treecleaners cleanup.
--
looks like christmas at fifty-five degrees
this latitude weekens my knees
EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:18:43 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
paludis requires tr1-whatever libs
4.1 ships those, so you don't need to do anything there.
Maybe one day Gentoo will have a PM that doesn't require any of that
and is just written in C and sh, using POSIX libc where it
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 07:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Except it won't, because ebuilds require bash regardless of which
package manager is being used. If you want to change that you'll have to
rewrite the entire tree.
Az once said near enough the same thing about baselayout. And that's
18 matches
Mail list logo
