On Monday 11 February 2008 14:47:35 Petteri Räty wrote:
Often we have someone wanting to become a dev and we need a to find a
mentor for him. What do you think about adding a status bit to LDAP that
would mark you as available for mentoring? Recruiters could then use
this info to forward
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Given that, what I think is that people's willingness to mentor may
depend on the recruit. So you'd need more than a simple on/off bit,
you'd also need a maybe option.
And probably area's of interest should be part of it. Even though I
have nothing to
On 21:47 Mon 11 Feb , Petteri Räty wrote:
Often we have someone wanting to become a dev and we need a to find a
mentor for him. What do you think about adding a status bit to LDAP that
would mark you as available for mentoring? Recruiters could then use this
info to forward people to
Often we have someone wanting to become a dev and we need a to find a
mentor for him. What do you think about adding a status bit to LDAP that
would mark you as available for mentoring? Recruiters could then use
this info to forward people to these developers.
Regards,
Petteri
Hi,
reading comments on bug 209538, I've seen this dangerous thing from Zac:
Once these issues are solved it will be nice if we can rely exclusively
on the dependencies from /var/db/pkg.
Well, the idea that devs will have to revbump packages just for RDEPEND
version restrictions so that
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:50:39 Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:48:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Well, the idea that devs will have to revbump packages just for RDEPEND
version restrictions so that portage picks it freaks me :)
Then there's: I do have a tool that
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:48:01AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Hi,
reading comments on bug 209538, I've seen this dangerous thing from Zac:
Once these issues are solved it will be nice if we can rely exclusively
on the dependencies from /var/db/pkg.
Well, the idea that devs will have
