Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories (was: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scip)

2008-07-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Alec Warner wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead of by the language they're implemented in. 90% of the time you don't care

[gentoo-dev] Re: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 'epkgmove' invokes bad memories for many ;) Thanks for ruining the few hours of sleep I'll get in the next days by bringing that name up... J/K -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpr7bNm44sJj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories (was: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scip)

2008-07-08 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tags instead of categories . . . Now here's a very interesting idea, indeed. Has there ever been a proposal like this for Gentoo? Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an old issue,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5

2008-07-08 Thread Ali Polatel
Hi, Hey! dev-lang/python 2.5 is going stable with arches cced on URL:http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178800. File your stabilisation requests that were postponed because of Python 2.5 in testing and make it block above bug. Please test a lot and at least report for x86 on stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400 Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some users would find this and just CC themselves on

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joe Peterson wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: I meant moves were largely pointless, although categories are to a lesser extent. Tags would be a lot better, since nothing can be categorized perfectly into a single place. Yes, I can see the

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Joe Peterson
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've moved content around; such as when doing a bump. Even better! -Joe -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:34:46 +0200 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose you mean git. Since it tracks content and not files, moves are trivial. Git actually finds your moves for you, after you've moved content around; such as when doing a bump. Ever tried git on an ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [OT] ecd function

2008-07-08 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 08-07-2008 19:59:05 +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote: You can avoid the issue with the license directory by appending a / at the end. Grobian showed me that a function is useful for this, I just do ecd xorg-server $ grep -A 3 ecd ~/.bashrc function ecd () { cd

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-client/opera: ChangeLog opera-9.51.ebuild

2008-07-08 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Jeroen Roovers (jer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jer 08/07/08 20:13:43 Modified: ChangeLog opera-9.51.ebuild Log: Use globbing instead of hardcoded $S. (Portage version: 2.2_rc1/cvs/Linux 2.6.24-gentoo-r2-JeR i686) [...] - epatch

[gentoo-dev] Re: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:02:37 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it's worth losing track of the CVS history just so we can have something in a different place that ultimately is hardly useful to anyone. Maybe it's time to test the feasibility of moving to SVN again?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-client/opera: ChangeLog opera-9.51.ebuild

2008-07-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 22:18:06 +0200 Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-9.00-install.patch + epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PN}-9.00-install.patch || \ + die failed to apply install patch epatch dies on its own, so no need for all the die statements

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 19:14 Tue 08 Jul , Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:02:37 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it's worth losing track of the CVS history just so we can have something in a different place that ultimately is hardly useful to anyone. Maybe it's time

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories (was: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scip)

2008-07-08 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alec Warner wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: I actually object to having crap in dev-python, because things should be categorized functionally instead

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags vs. categories

2008-07-08 Thread Josh Saddler
Tags . . . I like the idea. I like it a lot. Thoughts? Exciting? Or is it an old issue, and I'm 5 years late to the party. :) Probably more than 5... Well, that's not very helpful. Got any links? My archives.g.o-fu has failed me. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sci-libs/scipy - dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:02:37 -0700 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it's worth losing track of the CVS history just so we can have something in a different place that ultimately is hardly useful to