Doug Goldstein wrote:
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
default? Especially after a long time of kerberos not having a
maintainer (thanks mueli for joining the Gentoo club and maintaining it
now). Our current maintainer is working his butt off to get it up to
Hi,
I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists. It seems like
it was used
Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 12:11 -0500, Doug Goldstein a écrit :
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation
and
it really needs to get rectified.
[snip]
Maybe we should clean the whole thing up and do like net-misc/ntp does
it. Thoughts?
since I'm lazy:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Mende wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
zeroconf? ( !avahi? ( net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
avahi? ( net-dns/avahi )
Zac Medico wrote:
Christoph Mende wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on a new eclass for Xfce4 that, as opposed to the
previous ones (xfce42.eclass, xfce44.eclass), is supposed to be used
for all versions. Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that
Petteri Räty wrote:
The names of eclasses aren't shown to users and I think figuring out a
new name is a minor inconvenience so I would just go with the safe route.
I disagree: we should use care in choosing names, since these names will be
around for a long time. Using an ugly name might not
Christoph Mende wrote:
Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply xfce.eclass?
-Joe
Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
zeroconf? ( !avahi? (
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Mende wrote:
Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply
xfce.eclass?
why
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Mende wrote:
Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since the new eclass is not version specific, how about simply
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:15:25 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 13:43:55 -0500
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Mende wrote:
Now the most logical name for an eclass like that
would be xfce4.eclass, except that eclass already exists.
Since
Christoph Mende wrote:
Well, the desktop is usually called Xfce4, plus that'd match gnome2...
and more or less kde4
In general, it makes sense to me to have an unversioned one if there is no
version dependency - i.e. if xfce.eclass would likely work for future ones
(like xfce5). I'm not sure
Hi,
media-libs/aalib eradicator
added video herd there
media-libs/liboggzzaheerm
and sound here
Alexis.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Doug Goldstein schrieb am 04.11.2008 18:11:
Hey all,
A few ebuilds treat things differently with regard to this situation and
it really needs to get rectified.
net-misc/ntp
zeroconf? ( || ( net-dns/avahi net-misc/mDNSResponder ) )
net-print/cups
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:30:15 -0500:
In general, it makes sense to me to have an unversioned one if there is
no version dependency - i.e. if xfce.eclass would likely work for future
ones (like xfce5). I'm not sure why,
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:44 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote:
snip
bonjour is Apple specific branding for zeroconf. This is another case
that needs to be changed.
zeroconf/avahi/howl/bonjour/mdnsresponder all need to be condensed.
I agree. Let's just have zeroconf.
Daniel
17 matches
Mail list logo
