Marius Mauch schrieb:
It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly
FYI, I've opened bug to add repoman check for this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255358
/me also had feeling that it's good idea to rely on implicit RDEPEND and
since it's not true, it's better to warn developers
В Вск, 18/01/2009 в 00:52 +0100, Friedrich Oslage пишет:
Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
I'm raising this as an extension of bug 253076, but also because I see
the potential for danger.
As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
like /etc/baselayout2?
What
Peter Volkov wrote:
Marius Mauch schrieb:
It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly
FYI, I've opened bug to add repoman check for this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255358
/me also had feeling that it's good idea to rely on implicit RDEPEND and
since it's not true, it's
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:21:55 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
One thing to note why it's bad to rely on it is that if you have an
eclass setting RDEPEND then you are probably not getting what you
wanted.
Actually, you do. If you have ebuild:
DEPEND=from/ebuild
and eclass:
Hi all,
What needs to be done to get
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252157 and all the other changes
implemented on index2.xml to go live?
I have tried requesting information on the bugs, but this seems to have
got me nowhere.
If there is still work to be done, what is it? I am
On Sunday 18 of January 2009 16:21:57 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
And yes, I'd really like to see this killed for EAPI 3. Ideally we'd go
with a single DEPENDENCIES variable with labels of some kind,
something like:
DEPENDENCIES=
build:
foo/bar
build+run:
AllenJB wrote:
Hi all,
What needs to be done to get
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252157 and all the other changes
implemented on index2.xml to go live?
I have tried requesting information on the bugs, but this seems to have
got me nowhere.
If there is still work to be done,
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:01:54 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
What's the benefit of changing syntax so dramatically? (apart from
the sake of changing it to someone's liking) and what's so wrong with
zillion of separate dependency variables? Are they too easy to read,
implement
On 20:49 Sun 18 Jan , AllenJB wrote:
Hi all,
What needs to be done to get
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252157 and all the other changes
implemented on index2.xml to go live?
I have tried requesting information on the bugs, but this seems to have
got me nowhere.
If
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-01-18 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-libs/ice2009-01-13 11:41:17 b33fc0d3
net-libs/icee 2009-01-13 13:04:18 b33fc0d3
app-text/new
On 15:07 Sat 17 Jan , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
like /etc/baselayout2? The file must reside on the / partition even when
the major trees /usr, /var, /tmp, /opt, /boot, /home, /dev, /root are
separate mountpoints.
How
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 07:11:52PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:07 Sat 17 Jan , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
As a long term solution, can we just consume an inode and have some file
like /etc/baselayout2? The file must reside on the / partition even when
the major trees /usr, /var,
12 matches
Mail list logo
