This package is hard masked now finally. Another reference to count:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274341
В Втр, 28/04/2009 в 17:24 +1000, Daniel Black пишет:
This package relies on disabling of essential package management features
(collision-protection) to achieve installation. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I start to understand the real benefits of moving a larger
part of the maintenance down to the distro level as you proposed.
Okay, let's add support for CPEs at distro package level
and sync up and down with the central
# Tony Vroon chain...@gentoo.org (17 Jun 2009)
# Dead homepage, upstream vows not to maintain it anymore. No sense
packaging abandoned software.
# Removal: July 17, 2009
media-sound/ogg2mp3
For bug #274123. Should you wish to rescue it, you will take sole
maintainership and become upstream,
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2009, 11:54 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm slightly worried about it being called a service. Is it going to
be a new process that just does the mapping or is this a bad choice of
words? If it is a new process then I'm not sure such a thing
Here is the summary from Thursday's council meeting. The full log along with the
summary will appear shortly at http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council.
Regards,
Thomas
--
-
Thomas Anderson
Gentoo Developer
/
Areas of responsibility:
AMD64, Secretary to the Gentoo Council
-
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Tony Chainsaw Vroon
chain...@gentoo.orgwrote:
# Tony Vroon chain...@gentoo.org (17 Jun 2009)
# Dead homepage, upstream vows not to maintain it anymore. No sense
packaging abandoned software.
# Removal: July 17, 2009
media-sound/ogg2mp3
For bug #274123.
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 11:03 -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
I might be interested in taking maintainership of this
Please let me know when the homepage and repository are ready. You would
have to apply the 'prevent endian swapping' patch and roll a new
tarball.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:48 +0100, Sérgio Almeida wrote:
Hello,
Current State of Universal Select Tool - uselect
Proposal link:
http://socghop.appspot.com/student_project/show/google/gsoc2009/gentoo/t124022356237
uselect implementation started a few weeks before SoC officially started
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I start to understand the real benefits of moving a larger
part of the maintenance down to the distro level as you proposed.
Okay, let's add support for CPEs at distro package level
and sync up and down with the central packagemap
