[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test

2009-10-14 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200 Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this > topic? > > With packages as dbus that breaks with FEATURES/USE="test" hand in hand > with packages like dev-libs/gmp[1] there would really be nice to know if > you

[gentoo-dev] last rites: games-engines/kwest

2009-10-14 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (14 Oct 2009) # Requires aRTs and last released in 2007 games-engines/kwest

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Thomas Sachau
Branko Badrljica schrieb: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >> the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about >> USE=oldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should >> be treated as such. >> -mike >> > > Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documen

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Thomas Sachau
Mark Loeser schrieb: > Mike Frysinger said: >> On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:30:52 Joshua Saddler wrote: >>> All that to say, Tommy (et al), is that the idea of expecting users to >>> magically know everything and not to offer any documentation *in advance* >>> . . . is a silly idea. Good lord,

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Thomas Sachau
Joshua Saddler schrieb: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:54:31 +0200 > Thomas Sachau wrote: >> I disagree in this place. ~arch is called testing because it actually is >> about TESTING new versions and packages. You should expect problems and you >> should be able to recover from them and you should be ab

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > New dev-libs/glib, x11-libs/gtk+ and possible some other core libraries > should be in tree (package.masked perhaps) so users and developers can > help testing them. The current way they are moved from overlay into > ~arch is forcing them t

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Samuli Suominen
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, >> we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was >> synced wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 14 Říjen 2009 13:19:42 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a): > [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, > > we've seen many more bugs that only got d

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-14 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
[completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, > we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was > synced with some developer overlay, or whe