Dne středa 14 Říjen 2009 13:19:42 Nirbheek Chauhan napsal(a): > [completely offtopic from this thread, please fork thread if/when replying] > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Since the advent of outside overlays and layman, > > we've seen many more bugs that only got discovered when the tree was > > synced with some developer overlay, or when a Great Unveiling was done > > after limited, private, small scale testing (as with many GNOME and KDE > > releases, not to point the finger). > > If GNOME is involved, I would like you to point some fingers and tell > us exactly where you think we went wrong; exactly which "Great > Unveiling" are you talking about? If you don't tell us what we did > wrong, you surely can't expect us to fix the problem :) > > All GNOME releases are incremental, so in 99% of the cases, the > migration path is straightforward. If as an hppa arch dev, if you were > inconvenienced, we would like to correct the problem since it would've > definitely affected other archs too (and we know how understaffed you > guys are :) > Actualy i would like to hear what we in KDE did too, we publish into the tree as 0 days bump mostly since 4.2 and 4.1 was in the tree right away when we had working configuration.
But aparently thats not enough...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
