[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: KDE3 applications with bugs and KDE4 replacements.

2009-10-24 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (25 Oct 2009) # Replaced by: # # >=media-gfx/digikam-0.10 # kde-base/gwenview # >=media-gfx/kphotoalbum-4 # >=media-plugins/kipi-plugins-0.6 # # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-libs/libkdcraw =media-gfx/digikam-0.9* =media-gfx/kphotoalbum-3* media-gfx/gwenview =media-plugins

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-24 Thread James Cloos
When you first psoted this list I noticed some (or several?) live ebuilds. Git- is the one I remember. Those should not get nuked during global cleanups, as they are likely to be in active use notwithstanding their keywording or masking. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-24 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 24-10-2009 22:37:30 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > > The suggestion was to just introduce EAPI=3 with these variables, and > > making everything which is scheduled for current EAPI=3 just EAPI=4. I > > was told we could quite quickly have a Portage in the tree that would > > set ED and EROOT for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: how to become a package maintainer

2009-10-24 Thread Robert Welz
Am 24.10.2009 um 14:44 schrieb Duncan: Robert Welz posted on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:42:48 +0200 as excerpted: I am a gentoo user and software developer for a quite a little while. I found out that I have some spare time and I like to prepare myself to become a package maintainer. Are there an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread William Hubbs
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:24:51PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote: > Petteri R??ty schrieb: > > Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either > >> over profiles or via IUSE > >> +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Prefix: on EPREFIX, ED and EROOT inside ebuilds

2009-10-24 Thread Petteri Räty
Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 18-10-2009 14:31:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 18-10-2009 13:57:10 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >>> Hi, >>> You know i am totaly supporting prefix but i have one point. >>> Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being >>> run >>> and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread Thomas Sachau
Alistair Bush schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of >> default-enabled USE flags in profiles, especially in inherited basic >> profiles. > > Sounds like a reasonable idea to me, for the base profiles at least. Sure. If we have a desktop/kde subpro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread Thomas Sachau
Petteri Räty schrieb: > Thomas Sachau wrote: >> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over >> profiles or via IUSE >> +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE flags >> on every user including >> more dependencies, more compile time, m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread Thomas Sachau
Sebastian Pipping schrieb: > Thomas Sachau wrote: >> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over >> profiles or via IUSE >> +flag). > > I'm not sure for how much of the IUSE="+foo" cases this applies but I > can explain one of them: > > In xfce-base/xfce4-session

Re: [gentoo-dev] Amount of useflags enabled by default

2009-10-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 23-10-2009 a las 22:54 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: > Thomas Sachau wrote: > > > > In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over > > profiles or via IUSE > > +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE > > flags on every user incl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-24 Thread Petteri Räty
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > 2009/10/24 Maciej Mrozowski : >> If you have any comments, suggestions, important notices regarding this >> change, please keep discussion in gentoo-desktop mailing list. >> > > What about people who like to install both gnome and kde on their > systems? (Perhaps differen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-24 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Saturday 24 of October 2009 16:00:03 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Just so it is clear and there aren't any questions in the future. The > XFCE team maintains a set of recommended global use flags in our docs[1] > (maintained by Josh (nightmorph)). So, whatever direction this ends up, > xfce will not b

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-24 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Maciej Mrozowski wrote: Hi there! Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking place 22 Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon), having Gentoo GNOME team representative, it's been decided to go ahead with splitting desktop profile to DE-specific s

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-24 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
2009/10/24 Maciej Mrozowski : > If you have any comments, suggestions, important notices regarding this > change, please keep discussion in gentoo-desktop mailing list. > What about people who like to install both gnome and kde on their systems? (Perhaps different users on the computer use differe

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting desktop profile to KDE and GNOME

2009-10-24 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
Hi there! Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking place 22 Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon), having Gentoo GNOME team representative, it's been decided to go ahead with splitting desktop profile to DE-specific subprofiles, to avoid bloat

[gentoo-dev] Re: how to become a package maintainer

2009-10-24 Thread Duncan
Robert Welz posted on Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:42:48 +0200 as excerpted: > I am a gentoo user and software developer for a quite a little while. I > found out that I have some spare time and I like to prepare myself to > become a package maintainer. > > Are there any links that provide volunteers with

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-24 Thread Petteri Räty
Petteri Räty wrote: > I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have > keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that > neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script > and the list of ebuilds is attached. I plan on removing all t

[gentoo-dev] how to become a package maintainer

2009-10-24 Thread Robert Welz
I am a gentoo user and software developer for a quite a little while. I found out that I have some spare time and I like to prepare myself to become a package maintainer. Are there any links that provide volunteers with the neccessary know how of how to maintain a project? I have some money to bu