On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal DEPEND
is not sufficient?
PYTHON_DEPEND is intented to simplify specification of dependency on Python.
PYTHON_DEPEND=2:2.5 is shorter than:
Fabian Groffen posted on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:50:30 +0100 as excerpted:
On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal
DEPEND is not sufficient?
PYTHON_DEPEND is intented to simplify specification
2010-01-11 04:55:02 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a):
PYTHON_DEPEND=2:2.5:2.6
Dependency on Python 2.6 or 2.5.
The colon (':') has two different semantics here.
The colon is only separator of components, so it has the same semantic.
Each component has strictly defined meaning.
--
2010-01-11 08:50:30 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal DEPEND
is not sufficient?
PYTHON_DEPEND is intented to simplify specification of dependency on
On 11-01-2010 08:29:32 +, Duncan wrote:
Fabian Groffen posted on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:50:30 +0100 as excerpted:
On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Can you explain the intended use of this variable, and why normal
DEPEND is not sufficient?
On Monday 11 of January 2010 01:25:45 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2010-01-10 21:56:01 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
On 10-01-2010 09:29:28 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I would like to suggest introduction of support for PYTHON_DEPEND
variable, which would
It looks like what you really want is a ranged dependencies. From the
look of it though I have to second the it does not seem intuitive
opinion as it gives another meaning to the slot syntax marker (':').
Other than that, it seems like a worthy addition to the eclass.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue
This is an ancient eclass that was used when the Compaq C Compiler still
worked, but was removed from the tree some time ago.
Removal of the eclass on 2010/02/01.
Hi,
I'd like to request feedback on the attached new ruby-ng-gnome2.eclass.
This eclass supersedes the current ruby-gnome2 eclass. It builds on
ruby-ng.eclass and is used to install the various components and
bindings of the ruby-gnome2 project.
This eclass fixes
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Qt3 application, doesn't have a maintainer and has a few open bugs.
# bug #299083. Removal in 30 days
app-dicts/qvortaro
Pick it up if you want to save it
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since
the deprecation date, so...
Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11
Raúl Porcel wrote:
This is an ancient eclass that was used when the Compaq C Compiler still
worked, but was removed from the tree some time ago.
Removal
As KDE 3 has been removed from the tree, the kde-* eclasses are no
longer used by anything remaining in the tree. These eclasses are
scheduled for removal on or about 2012/01/11.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
net-nntp/inn
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Raaal Porcel wrote:
scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since
the deprecation date, so...
Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11
Reasoning? Prior to env saving we couldn't particularly punt
eclasses, but env saving is
On Monday 11 January 2010 16:05:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
net-nntp/inn
is as-needed support really a valid reason for punting a package ? i dont
think it is.
-mike
Brian,
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposal is pretty simple; if code modifies the vdb in any
fashion, it needs to update the mtime on a file named
'.modification_time' in the root of the vdb.
For example-
1) ${PACKAGE_MANAGER} fires ups,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 11.1.2010 23:23, Brian Harring napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Raaal Porcel wrote:
scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since
the deprecation date, so...
Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11
Hello,
Le Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:05:16PM +0200, Markos Chandras a écrit:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
net-nntp/inn
As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this.
By viewing bug #182782 , it seems to me that
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:08 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010 16:05:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
net-nntp/inn
is as-needed support
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100
Arnaud Launay a...@launay.org wrote:
But, if I understand this announce correctly, the complete inn
port will be dropped to oblivion.
Yes, and that shouldn't (and won't) happen.
Wouldn't it be better to stabilize inn 2.5 (there's even a 2.5.1
release out
Arnaud Launay posted on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:30:24 +0100 as excerpted:
Hello,
Le Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:05:16PM +0200, Markos Chandras a écrit:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010) # Fails with
-Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
net-nntp/inn
As a
On 01/11/2010 06:30 PM, Arnaud Launay wrote:
As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this.
Yeah, inn seems like a really high-profile package to mask for removal.
It would be conspicuous in its absence.
Would it make sense to post on -dev BEFORE masking packages like this?
I'm sure there
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:02:14 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm working on getting 2.5.1 in the tree (and fixing a USE=python and
some other issues while I'm at it).
net-nntp/inn-2.5.1 is in the tree and fixes many (QA) issues. Please
track bug #300650 [1] if you want to stay
On 01/11/10 09:47, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-01-11 04:55:02 Sebastian Pipping napisał(a):
PYTHON_DEPEND=2:2.5:2.6
Dependency on Python 2.6 or 2.5.
The colon (':') has two different semantics here.
The colon is only separator of components, so it has the same
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:36:37 -0500, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 01/11/2010 06:30 PM, Arnaud Launay wrote:
As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this.
Yeah, inn seems like a really high-profile package to mask for removal.
It would be conspicuous in its absence.
Would
Jeroen Roovers posted on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:22:05 +0100 as excerpted:
net-nntp/inn-2.5.1 is in the tree and fixes many (QA) issues. [ etc]
Thanks! =:^)
(Not to be an aoler and metoo, but I asked some time ago and the
consensus seemed to be that thanks were good even if they meant an extra
test-depgraph has a primary dep:
amit0 ~ # equery depgraph --depth=1 test-depgraph
[ Searching for packages matching test-depgraph... ]
* dependency graph for test/test-depgraph-1.0
`-- test/test-depgraph-1.0
`-- test/test-primary-dep-1.0
[ test/test-depgraph-1.0 stats: packages (2), max depth
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:40 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
is this a bug?
As the gentoolkit maintainer, I would say that it is a bug. Which
version of gentoolkit do you have installed?
Regards,
Paul
amit0 ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.4.5 (/usr/bin/equery)
Paul Varner wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 15:40 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
is this a bug?
As the gentoolkit maintainer, I would say that it is a bug. Which
version of gentoolkit do you have
29 matches
Mail list logo
