On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
since noone seems to care about this package, and it's blocking glibc
stabilization it will be removed from tree wrt bug 300218
last chance
thanks, Samuli
Its been saved.
--
Doug Goldstein
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:35:51 -0700
Denis Dupeyron calc...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm a bit surprised by the low amount of discussions this topic has
generated.
There's no discussion because Brian refuses to address any comments on
the proposal and just says we should do it anyway, and if you want it
2010-01-11 12:04:05 Gilles Dartiguelongue napisał(a):
It looks like what you really want is a ranged dependencies.
Dependencies specified in PYTHON_DEPEND can be expanded into ranged
dependencies in EAPIs, which support ranged dependencies.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2010-01-11 11:14:11 Maciej Mrozowski napisał(a):
On Monday 11 of January 2010 01:25:45 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
2010-01-10 21:56:01 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
On 10-01-2010 09:29:28 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
I would like to suggest introduction
2010-01-11 11:14:40 Fabian Groffen napisał(a):
On 11-01-2010 08:29:32 +, Duncan wrote:
Fabian Groffen posted on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:50:30 +0100 as excerpted:
On 11-01-2010 01:25:45 +0100, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
Can you explain the intended use of this variable,
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 04:22:05 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 02:02:14 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm working on getting 2.5.1 in the tree (and fixing a USE=python and
some other issues while I'm at it).
net-nntp/inn-2.5.1 is in the tree and fixes many
On 01/11/2010 10:43 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
(A general reply, not targeted towards you, Rich)
No prob - my post wasn't really directed personally at anybody.
Speaking on behalf of the treecleaners:
The fact is, some of us have never heard of inn and until Gentoo has
some sort of popularity
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:32:06 +0200
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks for saving this package. As Jeremy said, there is absolutely
no way to measure the popularity of a package. So if it has no
maintainer, and open bugs we have to mask it and announce it here. It
is up to you
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 20:21:59 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:32:06 +0200
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks for saving this package. As Jeremy said, there is absolutely
no way to measure the popularity of a package. So if it has no
maintainer, and open
On 01/12/2010 01:30 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
IMHO ( this is not a treecleaners@ opinion, i m just talking for my
self ), announcing and masking a package is a good way to inform and wake up
everybody to take care of this package if they really really want to stay on
portage.
I agree with the
Le Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Markos Chandras a écrit:
So if you want a package, plz take care of it :)
From a user point of view, having submitted ebuilds, patches
ideas and questions here and there on bugs.go, I must admit I end
up putting up my contributions on my local
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 21:40:37 Arnaud Launay wrote:
Le Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 08:30:26PM +0200, Markos Chandras a écrit:
So if you want a package, plz take care of it :)
From a user point of view, having submitted ebuilds, patches
ideas and questions here and there on bugs.go, I must
On Monday 11 January 2010 20:00:40 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:31:08 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 11 January 2010 16:05:16 Markos Chandras wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (11 Jan 2010)
# Fails with -Wl,--as-needed
# bug #182782. Removal in 30 days
On Monday 11 January 2010 22:43:18 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:36:37 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 01/11/2010 06:30 PM, Arnaud Launay wrote:
As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by this.
Yeah, inn seems like a really high-profile package to mask for removal.
It would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 12.1.2010 21:33, Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Monday 11 January 2010 22:43:18 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:36:37 -0500, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 01/11/2010 06:30 PM, Arnaud Launay wrote:
As a newsmaster, I'm a bit concerned by
2010/1/12 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dont be joking,
[...]
Mmmh? Take a deep breath, a long walk, a large beer, or whatever
works. Because you need it.
Denis.
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:08:34 + (UTC)
gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
Topics (messages 39032 through 39081):
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date
39032 - Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
[gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo
39033 -
Ben de Groot posted on Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:45 +0100 as excerpted:
2010/1/12 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:
If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to
put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH
Le Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:37:19PM +, Duncan a écrit:
FWIW, I feel for the treecleaners. It's a job with little
thanks and lots of chance to make someone mad at you, but I'm
glad /someone's/ doing it! =:^)
Yeah. I'm glad each time I see old things getting deleted,
abandoned software and
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:51:28 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
you need to fix your filter then. an open bug is not an
acceptable reason for masking a package. if you're going to clean
a package, you need to research actual reasons to mask punt.
-mike
Dont be joking,
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:37:19 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
So going with this idea... Isn't the treecleaner masking 30-day at
present? What about extending that just a bit, to 5 weeks total,
while reducing the actual masking to 4 weeks, with the extra week a
wait time
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:18:59 +0100
Arnaud Launay a...@launay.org wrote:
I have absolutely no idea how much work it requires, so I won't
complain if TC says it's too complicated/unpratical/etc.
rm -r * is easy.
BTW, I have no knowledge of the concept of proxy-maintainer, I'll
look at it
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com wrote:
amit0 ~ # qfile -v $(which equery)
app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.4.5 (/usr/bin/equery)
The newest version of gentoolkit has slightly changed the way depgraph
prints output. Could you try checking with the latest unstable
23 matches
Mail list logo
