On Thursday 14 January 2010 18:25:35 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 01/15/2010 12:54 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
That top item is the largest blocker. The actual conversion time is down
to 9 hours, but with more than that again in setting it up. I'd like to
get the conversion time down to UNDER 4
On 15-01-2010 00:34:08 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2008 18:46:44 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Exhibit A:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.4
8r2=1.49
This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for
/bin/bash.
On 1/15/10, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
git commit dir and git status dir still do full tree lstat().
I can try to make a patch or two to reduce lstat() in such cases.
That would definitely compliment the --stat option to git diff et al,
making git more usable on
Hi,
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
btw, latest python.eclass requires bash-3.2+ due to parsing errors in
the regex checks:
$ bash-3.1 -c '[[ a =~ ^(a|b)$ ]]'
bash-3.1: -c: line 0: syntax error in conditional expression:
unexpected token `(' bash-3.1: -c: line 0: syntax error near `^(a'
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:35:45 +0100
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010/1/12 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:
If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer
to put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
Proxy-maintainership should be given a
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (15 Jan 2010)
# Qt3 only application. Bug #299746. Will be removed in 30 days
app-i18n/qimhangul
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello!
By default layman currently stores overlays into
/usr/local/portage/layman
(was /usr/portage/local/layman before that).
As of bug 253725 [1] that's not without problems.
I would like to get it right with the next switch.
Would
/var/lib/layman
do well? /var/cache/layman seems
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:36:20 +0100, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hello!
By default layman currently stores overlays into
/usr/local/portage/layman
(was /usr/portage/local/layman before that).
As of bug 253725 [1] that's not without problems.
I don't think it should be
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:36:20 +0100, Sebastian Pipping
sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Would
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
--
Alex Legler | Gentoo Security / Ruby
a...@gentoo.org | a...@jabber.ccc.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
--
Cheers
Dawid Węgliński
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-01-2010 21:25, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
Wouldn't that break the rule that /usr/local is reserved for users / admins?
- From the
On Saturday 16 January 2010 00:33:15 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 15-01-2010 21:25, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
Wouldn't that break the rule that /usr/local is reserved
2010/1/15 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
/usr/local/ is a location the system should avoid. Somewhere in /var/
seems to be the logical place.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Jorge Manuel B S Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right.
The FHS (which we don't always obey, but in cases like this it's
useful as a guideline) says about /var/lib: This hierarchy holds
state information pertaining to an application or
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman instead?
Okay, how about
/var/spool/layman
then? Any objections?
Sebastian
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman instead?
Okay, how about
/var/spool/layman
Mike Frysinger posted on Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:45:49 -0500 as excerpted:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:55:18 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 02:45, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the better idea
though would be to split your stuff along the proper lines.
cache files = /var/cache/layman/
as i said: it's not a normal cache.
you said but didnt explain why it's
18 matches
Mail list logo
